I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 02, 2024, 09:37:28 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
532606 Posts in 33561 Topics by 12678 Members
Latest Member: astrobridge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  I Hate Dialysis Message Board
|-+  Dialysis Discussion
| |-+  Dialysis: Transplant Discussion
| | |-+  ABO match, 0/6 antigens, but crossmatch is good (negative)
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: ABO match, 0/6 antigens, but crossmatch is good (negative)  (Read 3168 times)
Sax-O-Trix
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 391


« on: June 08, 2010, 05:29:21 PM »

Okay, I am confused...  My sister was tested to be a donor for me and the results came back today.  We have the same blood type, we 0/6 antigens that matched, but they said she could be a donor because our crossmatch was good.  What?!?  I was under the impression that you wanted 5 or 6 matching antigens for a transplant.  I understand the crossmatch being neg. means my tissue/blood did not attack hers, so that is good.  BUT, I am still hung up on the antigens. 

Does this mean I will have to take higher doses of the toxic immuno drugs?  My brother is being tested next week, I am hoping for a better match...
Logged

Preemptive transplant recipient, living donor (brother)- March 2011
Rerun
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 12242


Going through life tied to a chair!

« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2010, 06:04:00 PM »

Yeah, that sounds odd to me. 
Logged

monrein
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 8323


Might as well smile

« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2010, 06:46:39 PM »

You shouldn't really be concerned about this.  The latest generation of anti-rejection drugs is more effective than previous ones and the only advantage in  the antigen matching would be for a 6/6 match.  This is particularly true for a living donor.

My transplant from my sister-in-law was a 0/6 match, I am B and she is O.  The transplant was done in Feb. 2009 and so far, all is very well indeed.

We have other threads on IHD abut this issue and if I find them I'll post.
Logged

Pyelonephritis (began at 8 mos old)
Home haemo 1980-1985 (self-cannulated with 15 gauge sharps)
Cadaveric transplant 1985
New upper-arm fistula April 2008
Uldall-Cook catheter inserted May 2008
Haemo-dialysis, self care unit June 2008
(2 1/2 hours X 5 weekly)
Self-cannulated, 15 gauge blunts, buttonholes.
Living donor transplant (sister-in law Kathy) Feb. 2009
First failed kidney transplant removed Apr.  2009
Second trx doing great so far...all lab values in normal ranges
natnnnat
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1281


WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2010, 06:04:53 AM »

Here are some (there are more, just throw "0/6 match" into the search box):

http://ihatedialysis.com/forum/index.php?topic=18196.msg315035#msg315035
http://ihatedialysis.com/forum/index.php?topic=18384.msg316955#msg316955
http://ihatedialysis.com/forum/index.php?topic=18243.msg315280#msg315280
http://ihatedialysis.com/forum/index.php?topic=16942.msg294781#msg294781     
Logged

Natalya – Sydney, Australia
wife of Gregory, who is the kidney patient: 
1986: kidney failure at 19 years old, cause unknown
PD for a year, in-centre haemo for 4 years
Transplant 1 lasted 21 years (Lucy: 1991 - 2012), failed due to Transplant glomerulopathy
5 weeks Haemo 2012
Transplant 2 (Maggie) installed Feb 13, 2013, returned to work June 17, 2013 average crea was 130, now is 140.
Infections in June / July, hospital 1-4 Aug for infections.

Over the years:  skin cancer; thyroidectomy, pneumonia; CMV; BK; 14 surgeries
Generally glossy and happy.

2009 - 2013 PhD research student : How people make sense of renal failure in online discussion boards
Submitted February 2013 :: Graduated Sep 2013.   http://godbold.name/experiencingdialysis/
Heartfelt thanks to IHD, KK and ADB for your generosity and support.
Sax-O-Trix
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 391


« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2010, 05:09:42 PM »

Thanks for the info.  I have been researching this frantically for the past 24 hrs., and it seems that the antigen component is becoming less important because of the drugs.  I just hate to take my sister's kidney if the risk is high that I will reject...  That would be tragic.

Is there a "magic" number for GFR when the Dr's. say "NOW!".  I am at 18% and am hoping to make it through the summer before surgery.  Oh, the team has NOT recommended fistula or PD surgery yet even though I have made it clear I want PD if needed.  Should I be pushing the PD surgery?  I do not do well with anesthesia, so I'd rather not be put through uneccessary surgeries.  Do they ever do PD placements with a spinal/epidural?
Logged

Preemptive transplant recipient, living donor (brother)- March 2011
coravh
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 221

« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2010, 12:47:35 PM »

My cousin and I were a 1/6 antigen match. Don't forget that they do a last minute cross match and you can still fail that - but that's another story. Anyway, I got the kidney from her in 2002 (8th anniversary in October) and I have never had an episode of rejection (knock on wood). I am also minimally immunosuppressed. I take 4 mg of rapamune in the mornings and 540 mg of myfortic twice per day (that's the equivalent of 750mg of cellcept). So with a poor antigen match you aren't necessarily more immunosuppressed.

I think they try to get the antigen matches as well matched as possible when you are on the list because they want to maximize the closeness of the match and this is a way to prioritize.

Hope you get your transplant soon.

Cora
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!