Ballistic Fingerprinting Smart Guns Trigger Locks Backround Checks One Gun a Month Waiting Periods Licensing Hand Gun Owners Registration for Hand Guns Safe Storage Laws
NRA opposes such laws because it would be unreasonable and potentially dangerous to impose one storage requirement upon all gun owners. Individual gun owners have different factors to consider when determining how best to store their guns. They alone are capable of making the decision that is best for themselves. Gun safes and trigger locking devices have been on the market for years, of course, and remain available to anyone who decides that those products fit their individual needs.
Storage and triggerlock laws could also give people the false impression that it is safe to rely upon mechanical devices, rather than upon proper firearm handling procedures.
Most states provide penalties for reckless endangerment, under which an adult found grossly negligent in the storage of a firearm can be prosecuted for a criminal offense. Responsible gun owners already store their firearms safely, in accordance with their personal needs. Irresponsible persons are not likely to undergo a character change because of a law that restates their inherent responsibilities.
Had Cho been force to purchase illegally there would have another opportunity for him to be caught before he was enabled.
He purchased the gun ILLEGALLY in the first place.
No he didn't. There are loopholes in a system you (BigSky) and a few other Americans think is a system that is sufficient or more than sufficient regarding gun control. How would you suggest to handle gun control being that you say I don't know anything about guns and you are an expert, BigSky?
The loophole is in the backround check. Because Cho was treated as an outpatient as well as not requiring all states to report to a centralized data base, his "condition" went undetected. Call it whatever you like but the system failed unnecessarily. Also if you were to implement some of the other measure I mentioned it would be more difficult for some would be criminals to have the means for purchase. Lying on your application should be detectable, if it's not, what is the point in filling out an application in the first place?Why would anyone not want to do everything possible to prevent guns from ending up in the wrong hands? The "It's my right" attitude is not for America TODAY. You can have the right to own a gun and help to protect the innocent at the same time, for most of the law abiding citizens of the U.S. this is not a problem. It is hard headed extremest like you BigSky that are hell bent on not doing anything about the problems that the current laws are faced with.
I doubt Cho would have had the resources to purchase a gun off the streets. There are many guns available in the black market, many of which have been stolen or bought legally (sometimes in quantity) by a legitimate source and then resold to to persons who deal in the black market.
If we have a one gun a month rule we would not enable these type of occurrences so easily. I can appreciate the right to bear arms and to protect one's possessions but that doesn't mean requiring registration and other measures infringes on that right. If someone is legal they should not be bothered by a process.
BigSky keeps comparing this issue to the first amendment, in my opinion that is absurd. A gun is a object that has the ability to take life, in my opinion that kinda stands alone. I truly believe that our founding fathers would not allow this to be taking place today. If we are going to protect the right we need to make the laws with the many in mind rather than the few. The majority of Americans would agree with taking precautions. At the very minimum there are manufacturer laws that have been proposed to aid in the cause.
BigSky, you are a riot! lmaoI post articles and you criticize me for doing so....now you want me to "prove it."whatever...