Almost everyone in my center is on either 3 1/2 or 4-hour treatments. I can't see how that could be right-- if everyone is so 'different' in how much dialysis they need, shouldn't some people be on 3 hours and 18 minutes, and some be on 4 hours and 3 minutes? Why do they think the human body functions on the hour and the half hour???
Well my nephrologist said that my 'clearance' has improved. He said that good 'clearance' is from 65%, and mine is now 69%. Woohoo! He also said that if my 'clearance' reaches 75%, then my time would be shortened.I am going to my next question and hope someone can explain succintly exactly what 'clearance' is.
Quote from: bajanne2000 on January 04, 2006, 04:52:52 PMWell my nephrologist said that my 'clearance' has improved. He said that good 'clearance' is from 65%, and mine is now 69%. Woohoo! He also said that if my 'clearance' reaches 75%, then my time would be shortened.I am going to my next question and hope someone can explain succintly exactly what 'clearance' is.well i guess to each his/her own but sayng 65% clearance is good wouldnt pass in nz but then the dialysis service here dosent have to push 3 hour session paitents out the door to make enormous profitsme i will stick to my five hours i know that i feel a hell of alot better than i do on a four session not only during the session but for the rest of the day - a marked differance to the crappy feeling a lot of you seem to be saying you experienceon the matter of thirst - i tried ice didnt like it! - tried freezing orange juice but ittasted awfull so what i do now is severly restrict fluid drinking and put manderin segments or grapes in the fridge and use the as the main fluid intake - dont leave the in the fridge more than 36 hours because they loose their taste.
Quote from: O in on January 04, 2006, 07:02:26 PMQuote from: bajanne2000 on January 04, 2006, 04:52:52 PMWell my nephrologist said that my 'clearance' has improved. He said that good 'clearance' is from 65%, and mine is now 69%. Woohoo! He also said that if my 'clearance' reaches 75%, then my time would be shortened.I am going to my next question and hope someone can explain succintly exactly what 'clearance' is.well i guess to each his/her own but sayng 65% clearance is good wouldnt pass in nz but then the dialysis service here dosent have to push 3 hour session paitents out the door to make enormous profitsme i will stick to my five hours i know that i feel a hell of alot better than i do on a four session not only during the session but for the rest of the day - a marked differance to the crappy feeling a lot of you seem to be saying you experienceon the matter of thirst - i tried ice didnt like it! - tried freezing orange juice but ittasted awfull so what i do now is severly restrict fluid drinking and put manderin segments or grapes in the fridge and use the as the main fluid intake - dont leave the in the fridge more than 36 hours because they loose their taste."O in" do you have any kidney function left? I was just curious because if you have some kidney function left that would help in you feeling better than others. But anyway here are some numbers for you.A Normal kidney equals 168 hours of continuous blood cleansing in a 7 day week. If a person is on the machine for 3 hours 3 times a week then that person will have an equivalent of 5% of healthy kidneys if the same person increases his/her time to 5 hours 3 times a week he or she is getting just 9% of healthy kidney function. Bottom line is anyway you look at it we are doomed. The urea floating around in our bodies is causing way more damage that will cause other complications. Not to mention the excess calcium and phosphorus floating around clogging arteries, or the excess fluids enlarging our heart. I say if you feel well with 3 hours as do I (I have zero kidney function) then that's all I need. But and extra hour on dialysis per treatment won't make a difference in the long run. If it makes you feel better to stay longer so be it however I hope you do not do it (stay 5 hours) thinking it will prolong you life. Because at the end of the day you or I won't die because of Kidney failure or dialysis we will die from complications of kidney failure.
Quote from: Epoman on January 04, 2006, 08:12:55 PMQuote from: O in on January 04, 2006, 07:02:26 PMQuote from: bajanne2000 on January 04, 2006, 04:52:52 PMWell my nephrologist said that my 'clearance' has improved. He said that good 'clearance' is from 65%, and mine is now 69%. Woohoo! He also said that if my 'clearance' reaches 75%, then my time would be shortened.I am going to my next question and hope someone can explain succintly exactly what 'clearance' is.well i guess to each his/her own but sayng 65% clearance is good wouldnt pass in nz but then the dialysis service here dosent have to push 3 hour session paitents out the door to make enormous profitsme i will stick to my five hours i know that i feel a hell of alot better than i do on a four session not only during the session but for the rest of the day - a marked differance to the crappy feeling a lot of you seem to be saying you experienceon the matter of thirst - i tried ice didnt like it! - tried freezing orange juice but ittasted awfull so what i do now is severly restrict fluid drinking and put manderin segments or grapes in the fridge and use the as the main fluid intake - dont leave the in the fridge more than 36 hours because they loose their taste."O in" do you have any kidney function left? I was just curious because if you have some kidney function left that would help in you feeling better than others. But anyway here are some numbers for you.A Normal kidney equals 168 hours of continuous blood cleansing in a 7 day week. If a person is on the machine for 3 hours 3 times a week then that person will have an equivalent of 5% of healthy kidneys if the same person increases his/her time to 5 hours 3 times a week he or she is getting just 9% of healthy kidney function. Bottom line is anyway you look at it we are doomed. The urea floating around in our bodies is causing way more damage that will cause other complications. Not to mention the excess calcium and phosphorus floating around clogging arteries, or the excess fluids enlarging our heart. I say if you feel well with 3 hours as do I (I have zero kidney function) then that's all I need. But and extra hour on dialysis per treatment won't make a difference in the long run. If it makes you feel better to stay longer so be it however I hope you do not do it (stay 5 hours) thinking it will prolong you life. Because at the end of the day you or I won't die because of Kidney failure or dialysis we will die from complications of kidney failure.NOdo you think i am stupid or somthing i dont need a lecture from you about toxin clerance and session times and besides after three interventions i know im going to die of heart failure long b4 failed kinney complitations kick in
Um... we all know WHY the standard of 3 x 4 or 3 x 5 hours per weekdx exists around the world, don't we? ...in case NOT ,it's because U.S. Congress ,after consulting with the 'expert advisors' they had then, decreed that _that_ was enough to'sustain life' and therefore all they'd pay for on Medicare, or whatever...back in 1972. A quote from the Victorian Senior Neph., who pioneered nocturnaldx in Oz, after a cost-effectiveness study on Renal Medicine, -"There's nothing I can't get off you in 8 hours dialysis per night!"-admittedly he was talking about 5 or 6 nights a week. The longer the dialysis, the more the clearance. SO Epoman givesthe equivalent %age versus 'real' kidney function, but then 'shootshimself in the foot' by saying he'll do less as long as he feels better.ER....where's the logic there??? Plus the longer you're on the easier & less stressful the UF fluid loss. I know it's a pain-in-the-arse staying on long times. I've done 7 once,when I totally failed to cannulate for a Sunday evening 4 hour sesh.,so 'made up' for it on the Tues with 7. Like Mel, I hope to do 3 x 8,plus maybe a short one still on Sun evenings when on nocturnal - no problem with boredom if you _can_get some sleep (!?) - buteven I have been guilty of cutting the odd session short(er) if thingsarise, like appointments or social stuff. But I don't make a habit of it! O.K. boys...put those boxing gloves away!!
I'm surprised your figures are no better on the longer dx sessions Epo', mate ...and also that you feel crappier after the longer sessions. Surely the lower the UF rate the better you feel afterward. I know for methere's a huge difference between taking off, say 400 an hour and 600 an hour! Different molecules come off at different rates too...I think it's the larger ones thatare later - but there'll be more experts on here who can verify that - so the shorterthe session the less chance you are giving some things to get dialyzed out !? 3 x 5/4/3.5 dialysis is purely a matter of $$$/unit time/wages and NOT based uponthe optimum health outcomes of the patient, let's be honest. Fortunately for me, I seem to be in the hands of a unit with a flipped ethos, in thatregard. But I suspect they're few & far between.....the reality for the in-hospital dx-ershowever, is still the old 3 x 5 here.
"..the longer your on, the more "good" stuff that is removed as well."- which is why some of the nocturnal patients end up requiring additives,even phopshate!!
My pump speeds are bad. 200 - 250 only.Kevno
The doctors know it is because my veins are damaged. I have everything done to try to make the flow better, an geograms to clean the lines out. No difference. This is my third set of tesico lines I have had in. All the same. Plus the fistula is as good as it is going to get. I had it done 1980. Lost most of it 2001. Only a 2inch stretch can be used. Also had Fistula grams done. To many needles in my arms. Plus the doctors can not touch my legs because of the vasc damage.Kevno