Just looked at UCSF (University 0f California San Francisco) ariificial kidney web site and they are posting that some time in 2021 they will be done clinical trials.
I wonder if the criteria to get one will be as estensive as transplant qualifications are now.
From what I've read about the "qualifications" for surgery, a person still has to be able to handle surgery in general (anesthesia, healing time) but there's no immune system response to the artificial kidney being present, and that's so great: No immune-suppressing drugs to take, no rejection to the kidney cells in the unit because they are kept isolated from the blood cells by the main filter. That's amazing to me.
It would seem as though we should be approaching a time when they could take cells from a person's own kidney, and grow a replacement which would alsso seem to alleviate the need for anti-rejection drugs since it would be from the person's own kidney.
But, as to the 'artificial kidney', I'll believe it when I see it. Over the last 30 years (since my mother had HER kidneys fail), doctors have consistently said that we were "5 years away from a cure"........
Quote from: Alexysis on May 16, 2019, 02:33:59 PMBut, as to the 'artificial kidney', I'll believe it when I see it. Over the last 30 years (since my mother had HER kidneys fail), doctors have consistently said that we were "5 years away from a cure"........This is my worry, people seem to get excited about the 'artificial kidney,' but it takes very long to get technology to market, especially something so complex that would have to be integrated into the body. Luckily we have the various dialysis methods that serve today as an 'artificial kidney'.
If memory serves me they took the prototype and used the components to construct wearable artificial kidneys and put them on a number of patients. The results were spectacular no fluid limits, no dietary restrictions.
There's also developments fróm the Kidney Project being used in development of D-filters.So shorter D sessions could be poss