A while back the news on the sequester was about chemotherapy patients who were denied treatment because Medicare no longer covered the cost of the drugs. Of course, I talked to my Oncologist about this and I will be okay even though it turns out that the very drug that concerned some doctors in the mid-west is the drug I’m taking. The cost is several thousand bucks per bag. That troubles me. Besides not getting any green stamps I pondered the question of the price. I hear stories about the profit margin on prescription drugs and if true, wouldn’t it be prudent to make this drug available rather than turning patients away. This isn’t aspirin, this is a cancer treatment. Are we that hardcore capitalistic? Or, how about a little more socialism? I suspect these patients are getting what they need, but I don’t know that. I prefer to think America is compassionate enough to do the job and shouts from the crowd to “Let ‘em die!” was just an individual’s point of view.Just thinking again.gl
Question, is that drug available to NHS patients? They have a $35,000 a QALY per year limitation on treatment or something ridiculously low like that. Socialism can bite the health care dollar just as quickly as the greedy capitalists as well.
However, in November 2008 Alan Johnson, the then Secretary of State, announced that for end-of-life cancer drugs the threshold could be increased above £30,000. [17]The first drug to go through the new process was Lenalidomide. And its ICER was £43,800.
The CDF provides an additional £200m each year to enable patients to access drugs that are not routinely funded by the NHS.
Cariad, nice information, but I didn't make a statement,
They have a $35,000 a QALY per year limitation on treatment or something ridiculously low like that. Socialism can bite the health care dollar just as quickly as the greedy capitalists as well.
Quote from: Hemodoc on May 30, 2013, 05:12:46 AMCariad, nice information, but I didn't make a statement,These certainly look like statements to me: Quote from: Hemodoc on May 30, 2013, 12:32:08 AMThey have a $35,000 a QALY per year limitation on treatment or something ridiculously low like that. Socialism can bite the health care dollar just as quickly as the greedy capitalists as well.
Cariad, interesting how you avoided the start of my post:Question, is that drug available to NHS patients?
I doubt arguing over this innocuous and reasonable question will solve the worlds problems so probably not worth bantering about it any further unless Gerald wishes to chime in.Take care,
Bloody hell!
It is an interesting world I live in. Way back when a doctor first said I had cancer, he was physically shaken. My only reaction was to ask, “What do I do next?”The cancer conference gets repeated three more times. One doctor made a long speech filled with what I call, “buffer comments” before actually telling me I had the cancer crud. I should have given him two aspirins and told him to call first thing in the morning.I am aware of what pulmonary embolism is and I am also aware of its sudden death characteristic. Even though the doctor told me over the phone late Friday, I could feel his anxiety. I am his newest patient and he is just now setting up his practice and I may be the first person he has told what amounts to “bad luck”. My reaction held no concern except for the revelation that I will need two shots per day, and since we live so far out of town, my wife will administer the injection. Now, that is scary. The survival rate for my class of PE is 63%.
I found a new doctor fresh from medical school who said from the beginning – Pulmonary Embolism.
our plan is put the information in the " I will think about it later " basket and go about business as usual .