There is one thing I can't figure out, and no matter how much I read I never seem to come across the answer. Why is it that you can keep going for months at stage 5 CKD with no KRT treatment, then when you start dialysis you need to go on 6 times a week? If my GFR is 12 today and I start dialysis, won't it be 12 tomorrow still? Don't I need just a little bit of help an not a full time regimen? It seems like D is all or nothing - why don't people start with D once a month, then increase frequency as kidney function declines? Other than fatigue and headache, I feel pretty good most days. Can't I just have one session of D to help me along?I'm really scared of being tied.to a machine and I'm going to wait until the last possible moment to start D. I know I will be really sick by then. If I could do one session to test it out without commitiing to 6 days a week for the rest of my life, I would probably start now...
At the end of the day NO nephrologist wants to put ANYONE on dialysis - it's an absolute last resort - so if you're told it's time, it most probably is, or is very close to it.
One of the reasons some Drs want patients to start dialysis earlier is because they can maintain the residual kidney function.
Dialysis will not maintain the residual kidney function. In fact, dialysis increases the rate of residual kidney function decline.
Quote from: Jie on May 28, 2011, 12:04:43 PMDialysis will not maintain the residual kidney function. In fact, dialysis increases the rate of residual kidney function decline.I hate to differ with you, but a a great majority of PD patients in my unit RETAINED most of their residual kidney function. For HD patients was a different story. I still had 8% at time of Transplant, which was 6 ½ yrs after I began PD.
Back to the original subject, it still doesn't make sense to me that someone with 10% of their kidney function needs the same amount of dialysis as someone with zero kidney function. Why doesn't dialysis start out as a supplement to your kidneys? It just seems like an all or nothing solution.
Quote from: Marina on May 28, 2011, 02:03:50 PMQuote from: Jie on May 28, 2011, 12:04:43 PMDialysis will not maintain the residual kidney function. In fact, dialysis increases the rate of residual kidney function decline.I hate to differ with you, but a a great majority of PD patients in my unit RETAINED most of their residual kidney function. For HD patients was a different story. I still had 8% at time of Transplant, which was 6 ½ yrs after I began PD.PD, especially with manual exchanges, can maintain urine ourput for a long time. But this does not equal to maintaining residual kidney functions. The 24 hr urine clearance test greatly overestimates residual kidney function when one has a kidney function of 0-30%. When one is on PD, I have not heard that any clinic will use the accurate methods to measure residual kidney functions. Almost every clinic uses the 24 hr urine clearance to estimate the residual kidney functions, which makes the clinic looks good because this overestimate can make it easy to reach the target of Kt/V. Many neph still use the 24 hr clearance as kidney functions, resulting in delays of starting transplant evaluation and getting on the list for patients.
M3R,Back to the original subject, it still doesn't make sense to me that someone with 10% of their kidney function needs the same amount of dialysis as someone with zero kidney function. Why doesn't dialysis start out as a supplement to your kidneys? It just seems like an all or nothing solution.