Someone told me once that if we do not have kids because of a history of diabetics, heart problems, cancer, obesity and other illnesses that may be hereditary (spelling sorry) no one would be having kids.What is your take on this?
I'm sure it does, Kat, but would it suck any worse if you didn't have kids?
Quote from: dwcrawford on August 11, 2009, 04:29:11 PMI'm sure it does, Kat, but would it suck any worse if you didn't have kids?Take it from a couple who desperately wanted children but couldn't have any ... yes, it definitely sucks not to be able to have children (if you want them).Marvin's kidney disease is hereditary, and cancer also has struck quite a few in his family (not him, thank goodness). Heart disease is big in my mother's family, and pure meanness runs rampant in my dad's family. Several in Marvin's family are diabetics (not him, thank goodness), and I had an aunt and a grandmother who were alcoholics (both died of cirrhosis). Knowing all this, would we have taken the risk and had children anyway? YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT!With the type of people that I think Marvin and I are, I'm sure we could have helped any children we might have had deal with any disease we might have passed down to them. Along with these "bad" genes, I like to think that we would have also passed down our good genes, too -- including the ones that help a person survive and flourish in a world full of unfairness and adversity. I like to think we would have shown them that love, perseverance, acceptance, faith, and a happy heart would carry them through anything else they might have to live with/through.There are worse things than passing down a chance of having a serious illness/disease to your children -- like not being able to be a parent in the first place. Believe me; I know.