I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 24, 2024, 01:59:08 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
532606 Posts in 33561 Topics by 12678 Members
Latest Member: astrobridge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  I Hate Dialysis Message Board
|-+  Off-Topic
| |-+  Off-Topic: Talk about anything you want.
| | |-+  Is there a GOD? - ding! ding! ding ding geeeeet reaaaaaady toooooo rummmmble!!!!
0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Is there a GOD? - ding! ding! ding ding geeeeet reaaaaaady toooooo rummmmble!!!!  (Read 179367 times)
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #875 on: January 21, 2010, 10:37:21 AM »

   I have tried to get other views expressed here so we could have sane, inteligent discussion about God from various view points. Not everyone has the same view point about God.  instead, we continiusly argue. One person beats us over the head telling us his views are THE ONLY VIEWS TO HAVE. Everyone else wants to argue with him. This is rediculious.  I have had my fill. If I may quote that famous cartoon figure Popeye, "That's all I can stands, I can't stands no more!" I have had my fill of ego and argument.
   Peter, people aren't attacking Christanity as a whole. Face it man they are telling you your views are your views, but quit trying to shove down everyone"s throut. I have resisted calling you a "bible thumper", becauser I don't believe in personally insulting you. I know you only mean well by telling people why your view of God is "the one true way". Understand, I am not insulting you, if you are insulted I appologise.  You may be right, but I'd like other people to express views too. That can't happen if we argue all the time.
    So, I am leaving this thread forever. If anyone replies to this, I won't read it I'm not coming back here to this thread to read it. Fight, argue all you want. You will just do so without me taking part in this madness.   :waving;
 
Dear Rob, you may call me a Bible thumper since in truth that is what I hold up and have done on many occasions.  I have only posted the view that either the Bible is true or it is not and the evidence from science and the Bible in support.  In such, that is not "my view or my opinion" but simply relaying what the Bible says for itself despite the fact that many complained about my long posts.   My posts were long to let the Bible speak for itself.  I have patiently presented this view and not resorted to name calling or insults despite all those thrown my way.  Intelligent debate can never take place if insults and mockery are the main calling of this or any thread.  That was the entire reason I became involved in this thread in the first place last August after I was tired of continuous anti-Christian posts and bold lies against the Bible.  So, I am only posting a conservative, Bible based, young earth creationism view of the world which many in this nation agree with.  It appears to me that the real problem is that I am speaking up on that view at all, even though it is the view that Epoman himself started this thread with.

I guess no one has figured out that if you really want me to stop countering anti-Christian views here on this thread, then stop being so derogatory to the Bible and the God of the Bible and I will gladly relinquish.  Go back and read Epoman's views at the start of this thread, I believe the legacy of his beliefs still deserve to be respected.
Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
rocker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 349

« Reply #876 on: January 21, 2010, 10:42:58 AM »


I find this fascinating from a psychological standpoint.  The link between fundamentalism and the authoritarian mindset is well-documented.  (An authoritarian mindset is a person who believes in strong hierarchies - there is one leader at the top.  People lower in the hierarchy are subject to those higher, etc.)

Peter had an entire thread devoted to his thoughts on evolution.  And yet, no matter how many times people mention that they do not find the topic entirely welcome here, he continues to bring it up again and again and again.  When someone gently suggests he take the topic where it belongs, he appeals to a higher authority - the dear departed Epoman.  Over and over he insists that since Epoman mentioned evolution in the post that started this thread, he is justified in bringing it up whenever he likes, no matter who objects.  No matter how unwelcome people find it now, he is justified in his crusade.

I just find it interesting.

 - rocker

Now, one more round of insults to Hemodoc down.

Could you please point to which words, exactly, that I said that you found so insulting?

  -rocker
Logged
dwcrawford
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5315


Getting the heck out of town.

« Reply #877 on: January 21, 2010, 10:46:31 AM »

Even Mein Kamph makes some statement that are true.  Get it through your thick skull that God didn't write the bible.  Jesus didn't even edit the bible.

Many people in the forum respect Epoman.  Some even tend idolize him.  I didn't know him and must respect the opinion of others on  here.

Logged

Come to think of it, nothing is funny anymore.

Nothing that I post here is intended for fact but rather for exploration into my personal thought processes.  Any slight, use of words with multiple connotations or other percieved insults are totally unintended.  I reserve my insults for private.
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #878 on: January 21, 2010, 10:55:23 AM »


I find this fascinating from a psychological standpoint.  The link between fundamentalism and the authoritarian mindset is well-documented.  (An authoritarian mindset is a person who believes in strong hierarchies - there is one leader at the top.  People lower in the hierarchy are subject to those higher, etc.)

Peter had an entire thread devoted to his thoughts on evolution.  And yet, no matter how many times people mention that they do not find the topic entirely welcome here, he continues to bring it up again and again and again.  When someone gently suggests he take the topic where it belongs, he appeals to a higher authority - the dear departed Epoman.  Over and over he insists that since Epoman mentioned evolution in the post that started this thread, he is justified in bringing it up whenever he likes, no matter who objects.  No matter how unwelcome people find it now, he is justified in his crusade.

I just find it interesting.

 - rocker

Now, one more round of insults to Hemodoc down.

Could you please point to which words, exactly, that I said that you found so insulting?

  -rocker

Dear Rocker, if you can't see the demeaning comments in your post about me, then there is not much sense pointing them out to you, you will simply dismiss it anyway.  In any case, I do not look up to Epoman as an authority figure in any sense, but I do have respect for the dead and the views that they expressed but can no longer defend.  I believe he deserves that legacy for all that Epoman has done through IHD while alive and in many ways since his death perhaps even more.  Authority, no, respect absolutely yes.
Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
rocker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 349

« Reply #879 on: January 21, 2010, 11:22:51 AM »


Dear Rocker, if you can't see the demeaning comments in your post about me, then there is not much sense pointing them out to you, you will simply dismiss it anyway.

So you cannot say how, exactly, I have insulted you.

But you are absolutely certain that I did.

  - rocker
Logged
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #880 on: January 21, 2010, 11:25:56 AM »

Even Mein Kamph makes some statement that are true.  Get it through your thick skull that God didn't write the bible.  Jesus didn't even edit the bible.

Many people in the forum respect Epoman.  Some even tend idolize him.  I didn't know him and must respect the opinion of others on  here.

Dear Dan, that is the entire issue isn't it on whether the Bible is the word of God or not.  Jesus didn't edit anything that He spoke, no need to since He got it right in the first place.  As far as the word of God not being written by God, that is not what the Bible states.

I Peter 1:22: Seeing ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren, see that ye love one another with a pure heart fervently:
23: Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
24: For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away:
25: But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.

II Peter 1:16: For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
17: For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.
18: And this voice which came from heaven we heard, when we were with him in the holy mount.
19: We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:
20: Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
21: For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.


Dan, you keep saying you do not attack Christianity, but it is by His Holy word that I was saved and became a born again believer.  Jesus tells us that He will not judge us, but instead the words that He has spoken with judge us.  They are eternally important.

John 12:46: I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me should not abide in darkness.
47: And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.
48: He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.
49: For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak.
50: And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak.

Lastly, I wonder if you understand how important the word of God is to the Lord.  We all know from the 10 commandments that we are not to take the name of God in vain.  If we are commanded to reverence His Holy name, what about His word?

Psalm 138:2: I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name.

So Dan, it was not my thick skull that put the idea of the word of God being written by God through man, but instead, Jesus knocked on my door and His words spoke to my heart and I was saved from eternal damnation.  I pray that you may know His words one day as well.
Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #881 on: January 21, 2010, 11:39:47 AM »


Dear Rocker, if you can't see the demeaning comments in your post about me, then there is not much sense pointing them out to you, you will simply dismiss it anyway.

So you cannot say how, exactly, I have insulted you.

But you are absolutely certain that I did.

  - rocker

Dear Rocker, you not only insult me, but you insult the memory of my father when you state I am an authoritative personality.  My father had many faults but never that of being authoritarian as is described in the authoritarian personality development leading to suppressed conflicts as noted in the authoritarian personality.  If anything, my father was much too permissive in quite opposite composition than that of an authoritarian personality parent. I had an amazing childhood as did my brothers and sisters.  When you call me an authoritative personality, you not only insult me since you do not know me in any sense to make such a libelous accusation, you also insult my wonderful family.  If you are too dense to understand the impact of your pronouncement not only on my integrity but that also of my family and my dear father who has passed away, then I must question your ability to analyze my psychological motivations or anyone else's.  Yes, my dear, your false psychological assessment is an insult not only of me, but of my family as well.

Authoritarian personality

The authoritarian personality is an influential theory of personality developed by University of California, Berkeley psychologists, Theodor W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel Levinson, and Nevitt Sanford in their 1950 book of the same name. The personality type is defined by nine traits that were believed to cluster together as the result of psychodynamic, childhood experiences. These traits are conventionalism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, anti-intraception, superstition and stereotypy, power and "toughness," destructiveness and cynicism, projectivity, and exaggerated concerns over sexuality.[1] In brief, the authoritarian is predisposed to follow the dictates of a strong leader and traditional, conventional values.
The authors of The Authoritarian Personality, having escaped from Europe during WWII, became interested in the study of anti-semitism. They advertised for volunteers and administered a battery of questionnaires. They selected the most anti-semitic and least anti-semitic of the volunteers and discarded the mid-group. They then contrasted the remaining two groups, coming up with the F-scale, which measures the basic traits of the authoritarian personality.
Recently, John Dean made use of the theory (as well as research by Robert Altemeyer) to analyze the contemporary political climate in his book Conservatives without Conscience.

[edit]Psychoanalytic aspects

Adorno and his colleagues regarded the fundamental basis of the authoritarian personality in terms of Freud's psychoanalytic theory, with an emphasis on early childhood experiences as the driving force of personality development. Psychoanalytic theory suggests that young children internalize the values of their fathers as a result of the unconscious, traumatic conflicts. From this process, the superego develops. Grappling with a strict, authoritarian father leads to the development of a very strong super-ego. Thereby, from the earliest childhood onward, unconscious desires and drives must be repressed and remain unsatisfied.
The unconscious conflicts that are unleashed are solved when a person projects the "forbidden" drives and aggressions of his superego onto other people. As a rule, ethnic, political, or religious minorities are selected as a screen for these psychological projections, because there are fewer social sanctions to fear. Authoritarians can often fall back on socially acceptable prejudices.
Alfred Adler provided another perspective, linking the "will to power over others" as a central neurotic trait, usually emerging as aggressive over-compensation for felt and dreaded feelings of inferiority and insignificance. According to this view, the authoritarian need to maintain control and prove superiority over others is rooted in a worldview populated by enemies and empty of equality, empathy, and mutual benefit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_personality
« Last Edit: January 21, 2010, 11:44:17 AM by Hemodoc » Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
dwcrawford
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5315


Getting the heck out of town.

« Reply #882 on: January 21, 2010, 11:44:37 AM »

The personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew.
Adolf Hitler
Mein Kampf

I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.
Adolf Hitler
Mein Kampf

There must be no majority decisions, but only responsible persons, and the word 'council' must be restored to its original meaning. Surely every man will have advisers by his side, but the decision will be made by one man.
Adolf Hitler
Logged

Come to think of it, nothing is funny anymore.

Nothing that I post here is intended for fact but rather for exploration into my personal thought processes.  Any slight, use of words with multiple connotations or other percieved insults are totally unintended.  I reserve my insults for private.
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #883 on: January 21, 2010, 11:52:17 AM »

The personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew.
Adolf Hitler
Mein Kampf

I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.
Adolf Hitler
Mein Kampf

There must be no majority decisions, but only responsible persons, and the word 'council' must be restored to its original meaning. Surely every man will have advisers by his side, but the decision will be made by one man.
Adolf Hitler

Very nice Dan.  You state that you want intelligent discussion on the issue of is there a God, except for those that are born again.  Rerun spoke of her faith and the gospel of Christ and was treated most unkindly for simply telling the truth of the Bible.  I speak the truth of the Bible and now you falsely associate me with Adolph Hitler.

Very nice Dan, but it does appear that you are off topic once again.

But thank you for calling and sharing.
Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
dwcrawford
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5315


Getting the heck out of town.

« Reply #884 on: January 21, 2010, 11:55:35 AM »

Off topic?  Was it not all about God?  And actually expressed a couple of your viewpoints.

How about:

The parties dispute whether the segments excerpted by Lerma represent "the heart of" the Works under the qualitative component. The Court is unable to evaluate this component because many of the copyrighted materials are incomprehensible."
- Judge Leonie Brinkema; US DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, Alexandria Division, Civil Action No 95-1107-A

"Generally speaking, it is my contention that Hubbard did no credible research of his own. Instead he distilled ideas from books he had read, the few college courses he took, his own experiences, and his very fertile and disturbed mind, and came up with a mish-mash of bizarre theories which he wrote down in scientific-sounding phrases and words."
- Jeff Jacobsen in "The Hubbard is Bare"

[Dianetics is] "an oversimplified form of regular psychotherapy mixed with hypnosis."
- Russell Miller in "Bare Faced Messiah", Chapter 9

"In a 1909 lecture, Freud explained a method for uncovering traumatic memories. Patients were asked to recall earlier and earlier life incidents on a "chain" until the emotional "charge" was released. Hubbard not only took the technique, he even retained several of the expressions used by the translator of these lectures. Freud had abandoned the technique, because it was laborious and completely failed to uncover key repressions. In fact, after sometimes providing initial relief, Dianetics all too often deteriorates into the dangerous conviction that entirely imaginary incidents are literal truth."
- John Atack in "The Total Freedom Trap"

"Hubbard redefined the existing term "engram" as a label for traumatic incidents where the individual has lost consciousness. Dianetics: the Modern Science of Mental Health proclaims that by "erasing" the engrams, the individual is freed from compulsions, obsessions, neuroses, and such conditions as heart trouble, poor eyesight, asthma, colour blindness, allergies, stuttering, poor hearing, sinusitis, high blood pressure, dermatitis, migraine, ulcers, arthritis, morning sickness, the common cold, conjunctivitis, alcoholism and tuberculosis. Hubbard soon claimed cures for cancer and leukaemia. No scientific evidence for these claims has ever been produced."
- John Atack in "The Total Freedom Trap"

[On Thursday 10 August, 1950] "Hubbard stepped up to the microphone to introduce the 'world's first clear'. She was, he said, a young woman by the name of Sonya Bianca, a physics major and pianist from Boston. Among her many newly acquired attributes, he claimed she had 'full and perfect recall of every moment of her life' [...] As people began getting up and walking out of the auditorium, one man noticed that Hubbard had momentarily turned his back on the girl and shouted, 'OK, what colour necktie is Mr Hubbard wearing?' The world's first 'clear' screwed up her face in a frantic effort to remember, stared into the hostile blackness of the auditorium, then hung her head in misery".
- Russell Miller in "Bare Faced Messiah", Chapter 10.

" Hubbard became ever more authoritarian and suspicious of the people around him. 'He was having a lot of political and organizational problems with people grabbing for power,' said Barbara Kaye [not her real name], a public relations assistant at the Los Angeles Foundation. 'He didn't trust anyone and was highly paranoid. He thought the CIA had hit men after him. We'd be walking along the street and I would ask, "Why are you walking so fast?" He would look over his shoulder and say, "You don't know what it's like to be a target." No one was after him: it was all delusion.'"
- Russell Miller in "Bare Faced Messiah", Chapter 10.

'People had breakdowns quite often,' said Perry Chapdelaine, a Sears Roebuck clerk from Mason City, Iowa, who was a student at Elizabeth. 'It was always hushed up before anyone found out about it. It happened to a guy on my course, a chemical engineer. They wanted to get him out of the school and I volunteered to stay with him in an adjoining building. He never slept or ate and was in a terrible state, no one could do anything with him and in the end they took him off to an asylum.'
- Russell Miller from an interview with Perry Chapdelaine, Nashville, 25 April 1986

"... by 1951, Hubbard was well known to the FBI. The opinion of the agent who had interviewed him in Newark that he was a 'mental case' figured prominently in his file, as did Sara's divorce allegations that he was 'hopelessly insane'. It was a diagnosis with which the FBI was inclined to concur ..." - Russell Miller in "Bare Faced Messiah", Chapter 11.

"We've got some new ways to make slaves here."
-L. Ron Hubbard, Philadelphia Doctorate Course lecture 20, 1952.

"With Scientology, Hubbard asserted that we are all spiritual beings ("thetabeings", and later "thetans"), who have lived for trillions of years, incamating again and again. He claimed that through the use of his new techniques, anyone could achieve supernatural powers. In 40 years, no scientific evidence has been provided for these claims."
- John Atack in "The Total Freedom Trap"

"It was only in the late 1960s, with increasing criticism of its methods by western governments, that Scientology retreated behind the trappings of religion. Scientology "ministers" take a course in comparative religion based upon a single book, and read the few ceremonies written by Hubbard. Their training takes a few days. They dress in imitation of Christian ministers, including a dog collar and a Christian-seeming cross. In fact, the cross is a Scientology cross, which clearly imitates that of Hubbard's role model, magician Aleister Crowley. It is actually a satanic "crossed out" cross."
- John Atack in "The Total Freedom Trap"




Millions Helped
Home
 
Discussion Board
 
Current Newsletter
 
Free Newsletter Subscription
 
Search
 
Site Map
 
Factnet Blog Feed
 
Factnet Blog by Email



 
Espanol
 GermanSpanishFrenchItalianPortugueseJapaneseKoreanChinese (Simplified)

Guide to Cults
Signs of a Destructive Cult
 
What is Mind Control?
 
Religious Fundamentalism
 
Cult Groups List
 
Terrorism Cults
 
Child Abuse in Cults
 
Cult Recovery Books
 
Terrorism Books
 
Spiritual Safeguards
 
Cult Discussion Board
 
Guide to Cult Recovery
The Cult Healing Hub
 
Cult Discussion Board
 
Cult-Help Experts
 
Cult-Help Organizations
 
Cult Support Groups
 
How to be an Activist
 
Recommended Books
 
Internet Resources on Cults
 
Cult Discussion Board
 
Guide to Scientology
Scientology & Dianetics
 
Scientology Celebrities
 
Newspaper Articles
 
Scientology Books
 
All the Sites worth Seeing
 
Help Factnet
Buy books to donate
 
Make a $ donation
 
Buy Goods to donate
 
Donor & Honor Pages
 
Create a FACTNet Mirror
 
Today's News
Cults
 
Cult News Trackers
 
Fundamentalism
 
Mind Control
 
Terrorism
 
Scientology
 
About
Mission
 
About
 
FACTNet Constitution
 
Disclaimer
 
Contact FACTNet
 
Ancient History
 
Newsletter Archives


Factnet Blog Feed
 
Factnet Blog by Email



 
Resources
FACTnetF.A.C.T.net Inc.
Fight Against Coercive Tactics Network Since 1993
          Since 1993, Discussion, Resources and Support for Recovery from the Abusive Practices of Religions and Cults
 
Did you know there are three other easy ways to donate? For example; buying your cult and mind control research and recovery books via our recommended books website links is an easy and important method of helping to support our mission and non-profit organization. As an affiliate of Amazon.com we get a percentage of every book we sell from our website.

Because only You have the right to control Your Mind.
 
 
Logged

Come to think of it, nothing is funny anymore.

Nothing that I post here is intended for fact but rather for exploration into my personal thought processes.  Any slight, use of words with multiple connotations or other percieved insults are totally unintended.  I reserve my insults for private.
dwcrawford
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5315


Getting the heck out of town.

« Reply #885 on: January 21, 2010, 11:57:22 AM »

                The Teachings Of David Koresh

                        Study On Joel And Daniel 11

            Transcription made available by David Bunds [Image]

Dear Brother Steve and friends, this is Vernon speaking. I'm very thankful
that we're able in these days to have the wonderful messages of truth and
we're going to share at this present time with you the understanding God
has given in regards to the writings of the prophets.

Brethren in Wisconsin, Revelation, chapter 10: If you'll turn with me in
your bibles to this chapter let's see what the bible is saying. For those
of you who wish confirmation in any statement from Sr. White, I'd like to
refer you to II Selected Messages, pages 52, where Sr. White says, "Those
who do not accept the word of God just as it reads, will be snared in the
devil's trap." So that's the statement I want to read from Ellen White at
this season.

Now, Revelation chapter 10. What is the lesson to be taught there? John
witnesses a: "mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and
a rainbow {was} upon his head, and his face {was} as it were the sun, and
his feet as pillars of fire:" Rev. 10:1

Notice, this messenger from heaven is a messenger of magnitude. Why is it
that he is in such garments as these, the cloud, face as the sun, rainbow
upon his head, feet as pillars of fire? For those who inquire, the answer
that I can give you is found in Deuteronomy, chapter 32, which begins, God
speaking: "My doctrine shall drop as the rain and shall distil as the dew."
Deut. 32:2a

God's truth, God's word is holy and perfect, we know that don't we? God has
a message for the last days. It's called the refreshing from the presence
of the Lord. People are familiar with Joel 2:28, which God promises the
former and latter rain. This is a message of truth which is to be given to
God's people that may know the work that God has prepared for them to do.
But notice how it comes. An angel is sent from heaven. Okay. Are we to
believe an angel from heaven? Well, notic this angel, verse 2: "And he had
in his hand a little book open:" Rev. 10:2a

What do we think that book is? Could it be the bible? Could it be the book
of Daniel as Adventists believe? For sake of argument it might even be the
book of Obadiah. There's only one chapter in that book and that's
definitely a little book isn't it? But regardless of the point we know that
whatever the angel has to present is found contained in a little book.

"And he set his right foot upon the sea, and {his} left {foot} on the
earth, And cried with a loud voice, as {when} a lion roareth: and when he
had cried, seven thunders uttered their voices." Rev. 10:2b-3

Now notice. If we could really witness an angel, it would wake us up
wouldn't it, or would it? Christ stated that, "if they believe not Moses
and the prophets, though one rose from the dead they would not believe." So
if somebody rose from the dead and we would not believe, I think it hard
that we would even believe if an angel came from heaven. But notice, when
the angel cried as when a lion roareth seven thunders uttered their voices.
Whatever the message is about that little book it's designed to wake us up.
Seven thunders, what more could God use to shake his people that they may
know his purpose as written in the book?

"And when the seven thunders (verse 4) had uttered their voices, I was
about to write: and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Seal up
those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not." Rev.
10:4

Now notice. Seven thunders uttered and yet sealed. John the Revelator was
not permitted to reveal this truth about the book. Which means simply to us
today that there is a message or a truth contained in the book which God
has not permitted his people to fully understand.

"And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up
his hand to heaven, And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who
created heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the
things that therein are, and the sea, and the things which are therein,
that there should be time no longer:" Rev. 10:5-6

Now we as Seventh-Day Adventists understand this to refer to prophetic
time. But who has the right to say that when itself does not say that? The
scripture in its context says, "time no longer." No longer referring to
what? The book? The seven thunders? What is this mystery about the seven
thunders that John was not permitted to write? Well, verse 7 explains by
stating: "But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel" Rev. 10:7a Not
the third angel, not the fourth, fifth or sixth: "But in the days of the
voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of
God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets."
Rev. 10:7

Now notice. Brethren in the Seventh-Day Adventist church. You have
proclaimed for years that you are presenting this message to the world. But
notice. Do you know the writings of the prophets? Can you harmonize and
chroniclize all that they have spoken in the message for the seventh angel?
You, as well as I, must admit you have not this ability. The book of Daniel
is definitely a little book but it contains twelve chapters whereas I know
of many books of the Old Testament dealing with prophecy have of less
chapters than chapter than 12. They have far, far less chapters. But here's
the key. Whatever the mystery may or may not be, it is found in the
writings of the prophets because God has declared to them.

"And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again, and said, Go
{and} take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which
standeth upon the sea and upon the earth. And I went unto the angel, and
said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take {it}, and
eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth
sweet as honey. And I took the little book out of the angel's hand, and ate
it up; and it was in my mouth sweet as honey: and as soon as I had eaten
it, my belly was bitter." Rev. 10:8-10

Now what book of the bible do you think possibly could be considered a
small book and be bitter in the belly? Well, you know the book of Obadiah
for instance it talks about Esau. Esau had an eating problem. But the book
turns out to be a good book when it states that on Mount Zion shall come
forth saviours which shall judge the mount of Esau. Well, that reminds me
of Revelation chapter 14, where there will be a 144,000 on Mount Zion at a
specific time, at a specific place, in a specific manner. But this is just
my thoughts.

But nevertheless what the scripture has emphasized is that "in the days of
the voice of the seventh angel the mystery of God should be finished, as he
hath declared to his servants the prophets." John is commanded to take this
book and eat it up. And in his mouth it is sweet but the effect of the book
is bitter in the belly.

"And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again..." Rev. 10:11a

That's the bitter experience. We have not understood the writings of the
prophets. We have not eaten the book. But once upon eating we find there is
responsibility because the prophecies explain what God's people must and
must not do in the latter days to be saved.

"...before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings." Rev. 10:11b

Was there a second angels message? Was there a third? Yes. "But in the days
of the voice of the seventh angel the mystery of God should be finished, as
he hath declared to his servants the prophets."

Now for our study let's simply go back to the writings of the prophets. But
see there's a far gap between my understanding and the individuals
understanding pertaining to the prophecies. Let's begin with the book of
Daniel.

Let's review what we have already learned about Daniel. We know that Daniel
was one of the captives taken by king Nebuchad-nezzar according to the
fulfillment of Isaiah chapter 39. Isaiah told king Hezekiah that his sons,
his seed would be eunuchs in the palace of the kings of Babylon. This was a
fulfillment of prophecy. Daniel was told in the second chapter, the history
of the world relating to the kingdoms of Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece and
Rome. But according to the prophecies of Daniel, additional light came. The
additional light referred to more complex events like for instance in the
seventh chapter of Daniel. Daniel beheld the four winds striving upon the
great sea and he saw four empires rise up. But instead of being symbolized
as a man image with a head of a gold, arms of silver, belly of brass, legs
of iron, feet part of iron and part of clay, he witnessed in this vision
the same kingdoms being illustrated as beasts. Beast kingdoms. A lion, the
bear, the leopard and the eagle. This is the burden of the seventh chapter.
We find that he was given additional information about future events in the
eighth chapter. In the ninth chapter even again Daniel is give certain
prophetic events which must be understood.

Now people say to me consistently, "Vernon, why is it you don't talk about
the gospel? How come you always want to talk about prophecy?" Well, you
see, prophecy, Peter tells us, is a light that shines in a dark place. Now
how would you have liked to have been Cyrus, the king of Persia, who came
according to prophecy and understood the prophecies and demanded that God's
people return to their land and yet they did not because they did not fully
understand the prophecies? How would you have liked to have been Alexander
the Great who died a death because simply he was fulfilling prophecy and
knew not the day of his visitation? How would you like to be the Jews who
did not fully understand the significance of Daniel chapter nine so that
when Messiah came he found them unprepared for his gospel? And yet today we
ourselves are in a period of time when we don't even understand the
prophecies. Revelation 10 is a Messiah to us, that mighty angel who comes
down bears the word of the Lord and states that "in the days of the voice
of the seventh angel the mystery of God will be finished", as he declared
to who? "His servants the prophets."

For instance, let's take a look at Daniel, chapter 10, verses nineteen.
This is Gabriel speaking to Daniel: "And said, O man greatly beloved, fear
not: peace {be} unto thee, be strong, yea, be strong. And when he had
spoken unto me, I was strengthened, and said, Let my lord speak; for thou
hast strengthened me. Then said he, Knowest thou wherefore I come unto
thee? and now will I return to fight with the prince of Persia: and when I
am gone forth, lo, the prince of Grecia shall come. But I will shew thee
(Gabriel tells Daniel) that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and
{there is} none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your
prince." Dan. 10:21

Now notice, Gabriel is to teach Daniel, in the eleventh chapter, that which
is noted already in the scripture of truth. What books were available to
Daniel in his day? Well, take notice that in Revelation, excuse me, Daniel
chapter 9 we find that Daniel was studying the book of Jeremiah, this is
found in the second verse of chapter 9. Daniel's whole prayer in the ninth
chapter is based upon the deliverance of God's people out of Babylon to be
restored back into their land. Well, we see here whatever maybe contained
in the eleventh chapter, Gabriel explains clearly that the mystery is
simply that he will now show unto Daniel that which is noted in the
scripture of truth. So the book of Isaiah, Hosea, Amos, Obadiah, Jeremiah
and such books were written way before the book of Daniel was written. What
great mystery is contained therein? We are not going to belabor this
chapter. What we are going to simply do is cover some simple ground to make
people think or at least to try to make people think, that they may hunger
and thirst after truth as it is in Christ.

Notice. We see the work of the King of the North as being a work that takes
place all the way from the time of Messiah to the end of the world. Now no
man has really lived that long. But we know there has been a power in the
world who has inspired men to do his bidding as there is a power in heaven
who by the Holy Ghost inspires men to do His bidding. So the power between
good and evil has been a consistent warfare since the beginning of time.
But notice about the King of the North. We find out in verses forty: "And
at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the
king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots,
and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the
countries, and shall overflow and pass over." Dan. 11:40

Now what does this verse mean? Well, at the time of the end. This king of
the South whoever he may or may not be is going to push at who? Him,
referring to the King of the North. Verses 40, chapter 11, that's what it
says, at the time of the end: "...shall come against him like a whirlwind,
with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter
into the countries, (not just one country but many) and shall overflow and
pass over. He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many {countries}
shall be overthrown:" Dan. 11:40b-41a

Now notice verse 41. This northern kingdom or King of the North enters into
the glorious land. What it is the glorious land? Well, many people believe
it to be Palestine or Israel. And this must be so because the next verse
says: "...many {countries} shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out
of his hand, {even} Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of
Ammon." Dan. 11:41

Well, clearly the glorious land must be Israel because these nations of
Edom, Moab and Ammon are now known as the Arab countries. Now notice: "He
shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt
(which is a southern country) shall not escape. But he (referring to the
King of the North, verse 33) shall have power over the treasures of gold
and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans
and the Ethiopians {shall be} at his steps." Daniel 11:43

Even the parts of south, north Africa. Now notice. Let's review. From
verses 40 to verses 43 what do we find. The time of the end this King of
the South pushes at the King of the North. The King of the North in turn
comes against the south like a whirlwind. He overflows the countries and
many shall be overthrown by him. He goes into Palestine or the Glorious
Land but the Arab countries escape. He even goes and stretches forth his
hand against Egypt and he has all the powers of gold and silver and
treasure and the precious things of Egypt. "But tidings (verse 44 states,
or news) out of the east and out of the north shall trouble him:" Dan.
11:44a

That's important information to know. After the King of the North has
apparently done away with all of these kingdoms, he hears these tidings
eastward and from the north.

"therefore he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to
make away many." Dan. 11:44 ...or utterly take away many. Who does he want
to take away? Well, let's find out.

"And he (the King of the North) shall plant the tabernacles of his palace
between the seas..." Dan. 11:45a

What seas? Remember now, the Glorious Land is Israel, so we have the
Mediterranean and the Persian, right?

"...in the glorious holy mountain..." Dan. 11:45b

What holy mountain?

"...yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him." Dan. 11:45c

Now, people say, "Well what do I have to worry about that? I believe in
Jesus." Now notice. Chapter 12, verse 1:"And at that time..." Dan. 12:1a At
what time? The time he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between
the seas and the glorious holy mountain.

"...at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth
for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such
as never was since there was a nation {even} to that same time: and at that
time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written
in the book." Dan. 12:1b

Now brethren, honestly, before God, if we do not know the events that are
foretold by Christ's own testimony, which Revelation 19 tells us, "the
testimony of Jesus Christ is the Spirit of Prophecy", then we can be
assured that our name is not in that book because how can we fulfill that
which we know not? The Pharisees fulfilled prophecy, they killed the Son of
God, did they not? They did because they knew not the truth pertaining to
the events of their day.

But here is a prophecy that tells about the King of the North and it also
tells us about these tidings of which the King of the North hears makes him
go forth with fury to utterly take away many. Now notice. At this time,
Michael stands up, chapter 12, verse 1 says clearly. Verses 2 of chapter
12:"And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some
to everlasting life, and some to shame {and} everlasting contempt." Dan
12:2

Not only will many of the righteous be raised but many of the wicked
likewise. Revelation says they shall see Him whom they have pierced. Now
notice. Verse 3: "And they that be wise (the margin says teachers) shall
shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to
righteousness as the stars for ever and ever." Dan. 12:3

So that's good news. Don't you think it's important to know who the King of
the North is? Don't you think it's important to know why he goes into
Palestine for and who he tries to take away? Now notice. Verses 4, chapter
12: "But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, {even} to
the time of the end:" Dan 12:4a This books been sealed, even to the time of
the end.

"many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased." Dan. 12:4b
That's a sign we can see today isn't it?

"Then I Daniel looked, and, behold, there stood other two..." Dan 12:5a
Other two people were there listening to this message, right? Watch:
"...the one on this side of the bank of the river, and the other on that
side of the bank of the river. And {one} said to the man clothed in linen,
which {was} upon the waters of the river, How long {shall it be to} the end
of these wonders?" Dan. 12:5b-6

It's a mystery. How long will it be? Verse 7: "And I heard the man clothed
in linen, which {was} upon the waters of the river, when he held up his
right hand and his left hand unto heaven,..." Dan. 12:7a

Not like the angel of Revelation 10 just holds up one hand, right? This
angel holds up both hands.

"...and sware by him that liveth for ever that {it shall be} for a time
(which is one year), times, and an half;" Dan. 12:7b That says three and a
half years isn't it?

"and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy
people,..." Dan. 12:7c Now wait a second. Who is the "he" brought to view
in this verse? Can anybody guess? Notice in chapter 11, verses 44: "But
tidings out of the east and out of the north shall trouble him: therefore
he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to make away
many." Dan. 11:44 ...or take away many. Verse 7, chapter 12: "...time,
times, and an half; and when he (the King of the North) shall have
accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these {things}
shall be finished." Dan 12:7b

Now wait. The King of the North goes into Palestine. He hears tidings out
of the east and out of the north which trouble him. He goes forth to
utterly take away many and he sets up his tabernacle between the seas and
the glorious holy mountain. He goes to scatter the what? Holy people, which
mean the holy people at this time must be where? The glorious land. Which
is where? Palestine. Now notice: "And I heard (verse 8), but I understood
not: then said I, O my Lord, what {shall be} the end of these {things}? And
he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words {are} closed up and sealed till
the time of the end. Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but
the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but
the wise shall understand." Dan. 12:8-10

So how can we be wise if we do not know these prophecies and what they
really mean? Key: "And from the time {that} the daily..." Dan 12:11a

The word "sacrifice" being in funny looking letters [italics
Logged

Come to think of it, nothing is funny anymore.

Nothing that I post here is intended for fact but rather for exploration into my personal thought processes.  Any slight, use of words with multiple connotations or other percieved insults are totally unintended.  I reserve my insults for private.
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #886 on: January 21, 2010, 12:08:47 PM »

Off topic?  Was it not all about God?  And actually expressed a couple of your viewpoints.

How about:

The parties dispute whether the segments excerpted by Lerma represent "the heart of" the Works under the qualitative component. The Court is unable to evaluate this component because many of the copyrighted materials are incomprehensible."
- Judge Leonie Brinkema; US DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, Alexandria Division, Civil Action No 95-1107-A

"Generally speaking, it is my contention that Hubbard did no credible research of his own. Instead he distilled ideas from books he had read, the few college courses he took, his own experiences, and his very fertile and disturbed mind, and came up with a mish-mash of bizarre theories which he wrote down in scientific-sounding phrases and words."
- Jeff Jacobsen in "The Hubbard is Bare"

[Dianetics is] "an oversimplified form of regular psychotherapy mixed with hypnosis."
- Russell Miller in "Bare Faced Messiah", Chapter 9

"In a 1909 lecture, Freud explained a method for uncovering traumatic memories. Patients were asked to recall earlier and earlier life incidents on a "chain" until the emotional "charge" was released. Hubbard not only took the technique, he even retained several of the expressions used by the translator of these lectures. Freud had abandoned the technique, because it was laborious and completely failed to uncover key repressions. In fact, after sometimes providing initial relief, Dianetics all too often deteriorates into the dangerous conviction that entirely imaginary incidents are literal truth."
- John Atack in "The Total Freedom Trap"

"Hubbard redefined the existing term "engram" as a label for traumatic incidents where the individual has lost consciousness. Dianetics: the Modern Science of Mental Health proclaims that by "erasing" the engrams, the individual is freed from compulsions, obsessions, neuroses, and such conditions as heart trouble, poor eyesight, asthma, colour blindness, allergies, stuttering, poor hearing, sinusitis, high blood pressure, dermatitis, migraine, ulcers, arthritis, morning sickness, the common cold, conjunctivitis, alcoholism and tuberculosis. Hubbard soon claimed cures for cancer and leukaemia. No scientific evidence for these claims has ever been produced."
- John Atack in "The Total Freedom Trap"

[On Thursday 10 August, 1950] "Hubbard stepped up to the microphone to introduce the 'world's first clear'. She was, he said, a young woman by the name of Sonya Bianca, a physics major and pianist from Boston. Among her many newly acquired attributes, he claimed she had 'full and perfect recall of every moment of her life' [...] As people began getting up and walking out of the auditorium, one man noticed that Hubbard had momentarily turned his back on the girl and shouted, 'OK, what colour necktie is Mr Hubbard wearing?' The world's first 'clear' screwed up her face in a frantic effort to remember, stared into the hostile blackness of the auditorium, then hung her head in misery".
- Russell Miller in "Bare Faced Messiah", Chapter 10.

" Hubbard became ever more authoritarian and suspicious of the people around him. 'He was having a lot of political and organizational problems with people grabbing for power,' said Barbara Kaye [not her real name], a public relations assistant at the Los Angeles Foundation. 'He didn't trust anyone and was highly paranoid. He thought the CIA had hit men after him. We'd be walking along the street and I would ask, "Why are you walking so fast?" He would look over his shoulder and say, "You don't know what it's like to be a target." No one was after him: it was all delusion.'"
- Russell Miller in "Bare Faced Messiah", Chapter 10.

'People had breakdowns quite often,' said Perry Chapdelaine, a Sears Roebuck clerk from Mason City, Iowa, who was a student at Elizabeth. 'It was always hushed up before anyone found out about it. It happened to a guy on my course, a chemical engineer. They wanted to get him out of the school and I volunteered to stay with him in an adjoining building. He never slept or ate and was in a terrible state, no one could do anything with him and in the end they took him off to an asylum.'
- Russell Miller from an interview with Perry Chapdelaine, Nashville, 25 April 1986

"... by 1951, Hubbard was well known to the FBI. The opinion of the agent who had interviewed him in Newark that he was a 'mental case' figured prominently in his file, as did Sara's divorce allegations that he was 'hopelessly insane'. It was a diagnosis with which the FBI was inclined to concur ..." - Russell Miller in "Bare Faced Messiah", Chapter 11.

"We've got some new ways to make slaves here."
-L. Ron Hubbard, Philadelphia Doctorate Course lecture 20, 1952.

"With Scientology, Hubbard asserted that we are all spiritual beings ("thetabeings", and later "thetans"), who have lived for trillions of years, incamating again and again. He claimed that through the use of his new techniques, anyone could achieve supernatural powers. In 40 years, no scientific evidence has been provided for these claims."
- John Atack in "The Total Freedom Trap"

"It was only in the late 1960s, with increasing criticism of its methods by western governments, that Scientology retreated behind the trappings of religion. Scientology "ministers" take a course in comparative religion based upon a single book, and read the few ceremonies written by Hubbard. Their training takes a few days. They dress in imitation of Christian ministers, including a dog collar and a Christian-seeming cross. In fact, the cross is a Scientology cross, which clearly imitates that of Hubbard's role model, magician Aleister Crowley. It is actually a satanic "crossed out" cross."
- John Atack in "The Total Freedom Trap"




Millions Helped
Home
 
Discussion Board
 
Current Newsletter
 
Free Newsletter Subscription
 
Search
 
Site Map
 
Factnet Blog Feed
 
Factnet Blog by Email



 
Espanol
 GermanSpanishFrenchItalianPortugueseJapaneseKoreanChinese (Simplified)

Guide to Cults
Signs of a Destructive Cult
 
What is Mind Control?
 
Religious Fundamentalism
 
Cult Groups List
 
Terrorism Cults
 
Child Abuse in Cults
 
Cult Recovery Books
 
Terrorism Books
 
Spiritual Safeguards
 
Cult Discussion Board
 
Guide to Cult Recovery
The Cult Healing Hub
 
Cult Discussion Board
 
Cult-Help Experts
 
Cult-Help Organizations
 
Cult Support Groups
 
How to be an Activist
 
Recommended Books
 
Internet Resources on Cults
 
Cult Discussion Board
 
Guide to Scientology
Scientology & Dianetics
 
Scientology Celebrities
 
Newspaper Articles
 
Scientology Books
 
All the Sites worth Seeing
 
Help Factnet
Buy books to donate
 
Make a $ donation
 
Buy Goods to donate
 
Donor & Honor Pages
 
Create a FACTNet Mirror
 
Today's News
Cults
 
Cult News Trackers
 
Fundamentalism
 
Mind Control
 
Terrorism
 
Scientology
 
About
Mission
 
About
 
FACTNet Constitution
 
Disclaimer
 
Contact FACTNet
 
Ancient History
 
Newsletter Archives


Factnet Blog Feed
 
Factnet Blog by Email



 
Resources
FACTnetF.A.C.T.net Inc.
Fight Against Coercive Tactics Network Since 1993
          Since 1993, Discussion, Resources and Support for Recovery from the Abusive Practices of Religions and Cults
 
Did you know there are three other easy ways to donate? For example; buying your cult and mind control research and recovery books via our recommended books website links is an easy and important method of helping to support our mission and non-profit organization. As an affiliate of Amazon.com we get a percentage of every book we sell from our website.

Because only You have the right to control Your Mind.

Dan Killing Jews is not my viewpoint.  Now, you are not only off topic, but out of line.
Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
dwcrawford
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5315


Getting the heck out of town.

« Reply #887 on: January 21, 2010, 12:13:35 PM »

send them to hell (a fate worse than death) but don't kill them yourself....


Who calls anyone down of off topica and out of line?  Get serious.
Logged

Come to think of it, nothing is funny anymore.

Nothing that I post here is intended for fact but rather for exploration into my personal thought processes.  Any slight, use of words with multiple connotations or other percieved insults are totally unintended.  I reserve my insults for private.
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #888 on: January 21, 2010, 12:21:02 PM »

send them to hell (a fate worse than death) but don't kill them yourself....


Who calls anyone down of off topica and out of line?  Get serious.

Dear Dan, it all goes back to whether the Bible is true or not.  If it is true, then we do have a day of judgement coming.  The story of Jesus on the cross prophesied in the OT is a record of God's Son for all to look at and know that God did give us His Son so that no man need to see the fires of hell.  He came to save not condemn.  That is why the question of whether the Bible is the true word of God or not.  Simple question Dan.  How do you explain why the OT prophesied the crucifixion of Christ hundreds of years before He died. Evolution or Creation?  Is the Bible true or is it not.  I have had one theme within this thread "Is there a God."  My answer, yes, due to the truth found in the Bible.  Is there a hell?  Yes and Jesus came so that no man should go there.  That is called the gospel of  Christ.  That is what Christianity is all about.
Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
rocker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 349

« Reply #889 on: January 21, 2010, 12:34:44 PM »


Dear Dan, it all goes back to whether the Bible is true or not.

You believe in biblical inerrancy, or so you have stated.

I do not recall what your response was to some of the things I pointed out in the Bible that are not in line with our current scientific understanding.

Some of them were:
Bats are a type of bird.
Rabbits chew their cud.
Pi is equal to three.

Can you explain why the apparent conflict?  And also, why the Bible seems to contradict itself in several places?  (Example - how did Judas Iscariot die?)

  - rocker
Logged
dwcrawford
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5315


Getting the heck out of town.

« Reply #890 on: January 21, 2010, 12:38:17 PM »

Is there a god?  We've heard your answer loud and clear.  Others have other opinions, some as well reasoned as yours and some not.

One question:  If Science proved beyond a doubt that the Bible is not true, would you just overnight lose your faith?  God, I hope not.  I hope your faith is more substancial.

Blessing of the Universe be upon you,
d
« Last Edit: January 21, 2010, 12:40:30 PM by dwcrawford » Logged

Come to think of it, nothing is funny anymore.

Nothing that I post here is intended for fact but rather for exploration into my personal thought processes.  Any slight, use of words with multiple connotations or other percieved insults are totally unintended.  I reserve my insults for private.
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #891 on: January 21, 2010, 12:45:59 PM »


Dear Dan, it all goes back to whether the Bible is true or not.

You believe in biblical inerrancy, or so you have stated.

I do not recall what your response was to some of the things I pointed out in the Bible that are not in line with our current scientific understanding.

Some of them were:
Bats are a type of bird.
Rabbits chew their cud.
Pi is equal to three.

Can you explain why the apparent conflict?  And also, why the Bible seems to contradict itself in several places?  (Example - how did Judas Iscariot die?)

  - rocker

Fair enough, let's go with the issue of Pi equal to three.  In any word puzzle or written math problem, paying attention to all points of the puzzle is the only way to get the correct answer.  I will cut to the chase, you have ignored the width of the bowl. It is put there for the purpose of accurately measuring PI.  So, the Bible is not only accurate, it actually records the value of Pi if you would have paid more attention to the details.  Take a look:

The Bible and the value of PI

Written by: Kent Hovind

Does the Bible contain a mathematical error?

I Kings 7:23-26 and II Chronicles 4:2-5 describe a huge brass bowl built by King Solomon. If the diameter of this bowl was 10 cubits, then the circumference should have been 31.415926...cubits, not just 30 cubits! Any math student will tell you that the circumference of a circle is found by taking the diameter times Pi (3..141592653589793...). This apparent mathematical error caused me, as a new Christian, to doubt the accuracy of the Bible.
The answer is so simple!
The diameter of 10 cubits is from outer rim to outer rim, the way anyone would measure a circular object. The circumference of 30 cubits, however, was of the inner circle, after subtracting the thickness of the brass (two handbreadths-one for each side) from which the bowl was made. This would be the number needed to calculate the volume of water. Substitute the length of your cubit (elbow to longest fingertip) for the letter C in the following formula, and solve for H.
30C / p + 2H = 10C
The width of your handbreadth will be the result. For example, my cubit is 20 inches long. If I had built the brass bowl, the outer diameter would have a circumference of 600 inches (30 x 20 inches) and a diameter of 190.986 inches (600 inches / 3.14159). The difference between the two diameters is 9.014 inches (two of my handbreadths).

Option #2

They may have measured the bowl's circumference under the lip and the diameter including the lip, which added enough to make 10 cubits across. Rest assured God makes no mistakes, mathematical or otherwise. The Scriptures do not contain error. By the way, Solomon built this sea in 1000 B.C., long before the Greeks rediscovered Pi (p). We may not understand some things at first glance, but the problem is with us, not with the Bible. Please be sure you are on the solid foundation of God’s Word, saved by the blood of Christ.

http://www.drdino.com/read-article.php?id=77
Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #892 on: January 21, 2010, 12:58:15 PM »

The issue of Judas that way he died is quite simple by the compilation of more than one witness.  He was hanged first, then when either falling or cut down, he fell down the cliff and burst open.  No conflict at all.  Simply put, it is precisely the manner in which multiple witnesses see only a part of the story.  Some saw him hanged, some saw him fall and burst open.
Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #893 on: January 21, 2010, 01:07:16 PM »

The issue of Rabbits chewing their cud is another easily answered question from Bible skeptics.  They do eat their cud, not as a ruminant, but they chew their feces and ingest them again.  Take a look:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/media/audio/answers-daily/volume-064/rabbits-chew-their-cud
Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
Rerun
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 12242


Going through life tied to a chair!

« Reply #894 on: January 21, 2010, 01:09:52 PM »

OK...........  back on topic and remember that anyone can express their opinion on here for as long as they want to.  But, attacking character is not acceptable. 

Hemodoc has done nothing but debate each statement he feels is wrong.  No reason to degrade him for that.

Logged

rocker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 349

« Reply #895 on: January 21, 2010, 01:10:04 PM »

Dear Rocker, you not only insult me, but you insult the memory of my father when you state I am an authoritative personality.

Well Peter, I must say that you have worked very, very, very hard here to prove to yourself that you have been insulted.

The alert reader will note that I said you had an authoritarian mindset, not an Authoritarian Personality, nor an authoritative personality.  I can note many examples of your appeals to authority to justify your own actions, if you like.

And studies have found a high correlation between religious fundamentalism and authoritarianism.  Here's one abstract

http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qst?docId=77022504

 
Logged
cariad
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 4208


What's past is prologue

« Reply #896 on: January 21, 2010, 01:15:00 PM »

I would caution everyone to not take Kent Hovind's math too seriously, unless you too want to spend 10 years in prison for tax fraud.

http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17231/dr-dino-sentenced-to-10-years-in-prison
Logged

Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a great battle. - Philo of Alexandria

People have hope in me. - John Bul Dau, Sudanese Lost Boy
Rerun
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 12242


Going through life tied to a chair!

« Reply #897 on: January 21, 2010, 01:16:04 PM »

Moral absolutes does not mean your are authoritative.  It means you stand for something or you will fall for anything.
Logged

dwcrawford
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5315


Getting the heck out of town.

« Reply #898 on: January 21, 2010, 01:32:11 PM »

Excellent point Rerun.  Hope both all sides of the debate will read it.
Logged

Come to think of it, nothing is funny anymore.

Nothing that I post here is intended for fact but rather for exploration into my personal thought processes.  Any slight, use of words with multiple connotations or other percieved insults are totally unintended.  I reserve my insults for private.
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #899 on: January 21, 2010, 01:32:53 PM »

I would caution everyone to not take Kent Hovind's math too seriously, unless you too want to spend 10 years in prison for tax fraud.

http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17231/dr-dino-sentenced-to-10-years-in-prison

I suspected someone would take note of who Kent Hovind is.  I do not support his tax position simply because he based it on a pre-1984 understanding of church taxes and his belief in the constitution  On January 1, 1984, Ronald Reagan turned the church into a tax collection agent of the IRS by enacting the first Social Security taxation of church employees prior to this date.  Dr. Hovind believed that the constitution prohibited this action from the government and acted upon those beliefs.  The reason that  I do not support his protest against the government is because they have transgressed so many aspects of the constitution that the constitution is no longer a defense that is honored by our courts any longer and is a lost cause should anyone contest current laws.

Dr. Hovind is in my mind a great patriot that fell on the wrong sword.

Now, his math is perfectly correct on this issue.  Perhaps you may want to actually do the math for yourself.  People are quite imperfect in this world, Christian or no Christian.  I have met Dr. Hovind twice.  Ironically the second time was when he went and preached to about 400 people in the maximum security prison where I also preached for several years.  I still keep Dr. Hovind in prayer and disagree with his tax protest, but we all pick our battles and which swords we fall upon.  According to the constitution, taxes on churches are prohibited.  That is because the founders recognized the authority of God and the authority of the government as two different spheres of power where the government had no power over the sphere of God's rule.  Obviously, people of today have no such respect for the authority of God and do dare to tax God today.

In any case, I would hope that you and others might have the courage to stand up for your convictions in the manner that Dr. Hovind has for many years even though I believe he chose the wrong battle this time.  He believed he could force the constitutional issue not recognizing that our government has long since escaped the bounds of our founding fathers document.  He is likewise paying a terrible price of 10 years separation from his family.  His main mistake in my mind was placing his trust in our government that they would adhere to the true separation of church and state that we enjoyed until January 1, 1984 when we began to tax God. 

As far as the issue of Pi in the Bible, Dr. Hovind has answered correctly.  Do the math for yourself and prove it out.

Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!