I’ve seen a few people on the forum question treatments promoted by people highly invested in the treatments. This article is more related to weight loss but it does do a very good job illustrating how just because someone can get written about in main stream media, or published in a science journal doesn’t mean its valid science.Short summary, intentionally someone setup a real study with 15 people to measure the effect of dieting well eating chocolate (the dark chocolate favored by health books), measuring numerous factors. They picked and choose the factors at the end that showed chocolate had positive effects and disregarded the factors that didn’t show what they wanted to show. They submitted it to a pay to publish science journal, sent out a press release and had global coverage, not one reporter questioned their science or got a third party opinion. This included Self magazine a major US health and fitness magazine that my wife subscribes to.http://io9.com/i-fooled-millions-into-thinking-chocolate-helps-weight-1707251800I Fooled Millions Into Thinking Chocolate Helps Weight Loss. Here's How.“Slim by Chocolate!” the headlines blared. A team of German researchers had found that people on a low-carb diet lost weight 10 percent faster if they ate a chocolate bar every day. It made the front page of Bild, Europe’s largest daily newspaper, just beneath their update about the Germanwings crash. From there, it ricocheted around the internet and beyond, making news in more than 20 countries and half a dozen languages. It was discussed on television news shows. It appeared in glossy print, most recently in the June issue of Shape magazine (“Why You Must Eat Chocolate Daily”, page 128). Not only does chocolate accelerate weight loss, the study found, but it leads to healthier cholesterol levels and overall increased well-being. The Bild story quotes the study’s lead author, Johannes Bohannon, Ph.D., research director of the Institute of Diet and Health: “The best part is you can buy chocolate everywhere.”I am Johannes Bohannon, Ph.D. Well, actually my name is John, and I’m a journalist. I do have a Ph.D., but it’s in the molecular biology of bacteria, not humans. The Institute of Diet and Health? That’s nothing more than a website.Other than those fibs, the study was 100 percent authentic. My colleagues and I recruited actual human subjects in Germany. We ran an actual clinical trial, with subjects randomly assigned to different diet regimes. And the statistically significant benefits of chocolate that we reported are based on the actual data. It was, in fact, a fairly typical study for the field of diet research. Which is to say: It was terrible science. The results are meaningless, and the health claims that the media blasted out to millions of people around the world are utterly unfounded.Here’s how we did it.I’m glad there are people out there who care about things like this that bother me but I’ll do nothing about….
Thank you iolaire for this very interesting article... there is one question that suddenly "spooks" through my mind:Could it be, that these researchers were indirectly "employed" by a few chocolate companies ?... I wonder about this because I have read recently that "Suchard", "Milka" and the Swiss "Toblerone"are battling a bit a little because people are becoming more health-conscious and therefore ...... Just a thought...Best wishes from Kristina
As the great American P. T. Barnum said " Theres a sucker born every minute"
Thanks again iolaire.Do you think this film might be shown on youtube?In which language do they show the film ? English or German?Do you read/speak German?Thanks again from Kristina.