Achieving optimal dialysis-related fundingWe believe quality care can only continue to improve if government rules and regulations provide for optimal funding for dialysis and related products and services. We believe this is best achieved by educating, understanding, building credibility with key government officials, and respecting the need for strong clinical returns on government expenditures.
As for those of you who say that it is private insurance that is the profit - my reply is that the only profit should be in patient health and survival. I am all for compensating executives who do a great job, but a paycheck worth $11,000,000 for Thiry in 2009 is excessivein an industry that pleads lack of funds and creates a patient advocacy group with a mission to lobby government for more money.
Anyone here from Colorado?Well, according to Davita, you are so "hugely blessed":
Vlchek neglected to mention that since Thiry's move, Davita has been under investigation by the Colorado Department of Public Health for infecting their patients with MRSA and hepatitis due to cartridge reuse mix-ups:"Pikes Peak Dialysis Center and Printers Place Dialysis Center, both owned by Denver-based DaVita, the mix-ups resulted in an investigation by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment."http://www.gazette.com/articles/dialysis-102290-three-mix.html