And Lisa I agree they should have ages on everyone's profile.
These sorts of discussions more often than not seem to leave out one important consideration, and that is what maternal renal disease might do to a developing baby.Would you want to risk a stillbirth or a live birth to a premature baby who may very well have a short life of dreadful suffering?I developed pre-eclampsia during the late stages of my one and only pregnancy and was hospitalized for a total of 6 weeks. I didn't know I had CKD at the time. Six months after the birth, I was diagnosed with fsgs.A year later, it became apparent that my beyond beautiful little boy had a developmental disorder. He was later diagnosed with high-functioning autism.Did my undiagnosed fsgs/diminished renal function cause my boy to be autistic? I don't know, but I suspect so. Did I somehow condemn my only child to a lifetime of disability? I can't escape that notion because no one can tell me for sure one way or another.I am very sorry that you are in this predicament. Just remember that there is a baby to consider.
MM, as is so often the case, I agree wholeheartedly with you. I failed in my post to make clear that overriding all of our thoughts and discussions about having a child was the health and welfare of said child...from conception to adulthood. We felt strongly that our need to be parents was and ought to be secondary to that and we never felt secure enough about what we could offer. Nothing in life is ever certain but some situations start off much murkier than others for sure.
JBeany, I am shocked at the way that your doctor treated you, since it sounds as if he influenced your decision. it is absolute bunkum. there are plenty of high risk OB-Gyns out there who would take on the management of issues related to a high-risk pregnancy.