Because animals don't understand why they are sick and to have to be confined and have needles etc... I would never put my dog through what I have to go through.
I saw a news report way back in 1994 on chronic dialysis for dogs in the United States. This is pretty disturbing, considering that in many parts of the world, people with renal failure are simply allowed to die because the state cannot afford to buy enough dialysis machines to cover the entire endstage renal disease population. When I was in the Philippines, none of the other patients at the dialysis center could believe that I was a dialysis patient, since in that country they all look horribly sick, given that they have to pay for dialysis privately, and can at most afford to come for treatment once a week.Interestingly, it is very common to perform kidney transplants for cats with renal failure, because there are not the same tissue typing problems for cats as there are for humans, so every cat is a good match for every other cat. This is surprising, given that cats have been domesticated since prehistoric times, and have travelled with their human masters over all the world, which should have caused enough genetic variation to arise in cats so that they would no longer be good HLA matches for each other. But somehow their obvious splitting into different genetic types has not introduced the diversity typical of humans, who have 625 HLA groups, just counting those taken into consideration for organ matching. If only humans had the luck of cats, the misery of renal failure could be enormously reduced for the human population. What malevolent force of the universe decided to make cats more fortunate than people?
She didn't pick me to be her owner, I picked her. As such she is not disposable because of cost to me. As long as there is a good future of healing and quality of life for her I have a moral obligation to pay and do whatever I can for her.
Animals are a different breed from the human animal and things that happen to them that would kill a human can often be reversed.If sudden kidney failure occurred in my dog and there was a chance it was just a short term thing I would do everything I could to give her a chance. I would likely be selfish though and pay for a couple treatments just to give myself more time with her.If it was something long term in that her kidneys would not heal I would not let her continue on in that manner of misery, as it is one thing for a human who has understanding to be able to cope with renal failure and quite another for a animal who has no idea to the extent or understanding of it to cope with it. She didn't pick me to be her owner, I picked her. As such she is not disposable because of cost to me. As long as there is a good future of healing and quality of life for her I have a moral obligation to pay and do whatever I can for her.
Ok, how much per treatment is too much? I'm billed $3,000 per treatment. In this scenario it would depend on each individuals pocketbook as to how much they are willing to keep their dog alive. Is it worth putting the dog through what I go through for just 3 more days of life for "my enjoyment" and at this point is anyone enjoying life?Man......this is making me question my own dialysis.