And if we institute the type of health care "reforms" that President Obama wants to see, our health care system will start to resemble yours: Bureaucratic, the arrogance of government civil servants, the whole nine yards.
I have calculated that over the past five years (which was when it was discovered that my fsgs was far more advanced that I had thought), my husband has spent over $10,000 in out of pocket costs for co-pays on my meds and trips to the neph, and I'm not even on dialysis yet. We HAVE insurance, but the bills are still steep. And I use generics if they are available.I left the UK about 7 years ago, so things might have changed, but when I was there, you paid a flat rate for any prescription your doctor gave you. I'm sure the price has gone up, but the last I recall, it was about $10. However, you did not have to pay if 1. you were under the age of 16, 2. If you were over the age of 65, 3. if you were pregnant, 4, if you had given birth within the past year, 5. if you were on income support, 6. if you were in the military. (Anyone here from the UK, please let me know what the current rules are; I'd be curious to know). I never paid to see my GP nor any consultants on the NHS. However, through my husband's employer, we did have private insurance (BUPA...does that still exist?), so a couple of times, I saw a consultant privately and was charged about $100. So, people in the UK DO have access to private insurance if their employer offers it. It works well for acute illnesses, but the NHS is generally better for chronic illnesses (in fact, I don't think private insurance companies in the UK will cover chronic illness, anyway. Someone please let me know if that is still the case.)
I do not allow you to make fun about my situation!
Richard, why don’t you check-up in Australia? A group of patients deal with health-care accidents in Australia