I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 25, 2024, 08:19:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
532606 Posts in 33561 Topics by 12678 Members
Latest Member: astrobridge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  I Hate Dialysis Message Board
|-+  Dialysis Discussion
| |-+  Dialysis: News Articles
| | |-+  A quirky twist on cannibalizing organs
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: A quirky twist on cannibalizing organs  (Read 1388 times)
okarol
Administrator
Member for Life
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 100933


Photo is Jenna - after Disneyland - 1988

WWW
« on: July 12, 2009, 02:11:50 AM »

Published: July 12, 2009 3:00 a.m.
A quirky twist on cannibalizing organs
Reviewed by Marcela Valdes

Book facts
“The Unit”

By Ninni Holmqvist, Marlaine

268 pages,
paperback, $14.95

Here’s a modest proposal: Now that Americans are raiding Medicare and unemployment funds more desperately than ever before, why don’t we dispense with these mushy-gushy entitlement programs and lock up all the single people older than 60 in a prison where we can harvest their organs? That way, these “dispensables,” who aren’t bolstering the nation’s GDP, can contribute something to keep the prosperity of the “needed” citizens on track.

Such is the horrifying premise behind Swedish author Ninni Holmqvist’s first novel, “The Unit,” a haunting, deadpan tale set vaguely in the Scandinavian future. Actually, in Holmqvist’s book the situation is even more grotesque: In a nice sexist flourish, single women without children are classified as “dispensable” at 50, 10 years earlier than the men.

So it is that one spring morning, Dorrit Weger finds herself standing outside her ramshackle house, waiting, like so much trash, for the SUV that will whisk her away to the Second Reserve Bank Unit for biological material. It’s one of Holmqvist’s many nifty reversals that Dorrit already knows exactly what the Unit has in store for her: involuntary participation in drug trials and psychological experiments, forced kidney and lung donations. Her awareness is a change of pace for us. Loads of books and films have imagined worlds where humans prey upon the bodies of others – “The Handmaid’s Tale,” “Never Let Me Go” and “Soylent Green” all come to mind – but the convention of this cannibalistic genre is not to expose the use of bodies until deep into the story.

In “The Unit,” however, the dirty secret isn’t secret; it’s accepted national policy and not much cloaked in euphemism. The Unit turns out to be as much paradise as hell. The residents live in comfortable one-bedroom apartments. Their giant prison gleams with top-of-the-line luxuries, among them a library, an art gallery, a café, a gym, a music store and several fancy boutiques. They eat five-course meals. Best of all, for them, everything is free.

Dorrit’s favorite place is the Unit’s enormous winter garden. The garden’s lush plants serve as a pretty backdrop for many of the novel’s scenes, but they’re also a deft symbol for Dorrit and her ilk. Many of the Unit’s residents are hothouse flowers: writers, artists, homosexuals and intellectuals whose pursuit of love, beauty or freedom has set them at odds with their marrying-and-producing peers. Housed all together, freed from financial stress, drawn close by the looming prospect of death, these dispensables often find the golden apples they’ve been seeking all their lives, even as their “biological material” is harvested year by year.

Holmqvist’s spare prose interweaves the Unit’s pleasures and cruelties with exquisite matter-of-factness, so that readers actually begin to wonder: On balance, is life better as a pampered lab bunny or as a lonely indigent?

But then she turns the screw, presenting a set of events so miraculous and abominable that they literally made me gasp. By then, it’s clear that even for married couples with children, the world outside the Unit has turned into a nightmare. And the issue of whether Dorrit is happier in her gleaming Dickensian prison gives way to a larger question: Who could bear to live in the mechanistic world that created such a place?

Marcela Valdes, a contributing editor at Publishers Weekly, wrote this review for Washington Post Book World.

http://www.journalgazette.net/article/20090712/ENT07/307129962/-1/ENT05
Logged


Admin for IHateDialysis 2008 - 2014, retired.
Jenna is our daughter, bad bladder damaged her kidneys.
Was on in-center hemodialysis 2003-2007.
7 yr transplant lost due to rejection.
She did PD Sept. 2013 - July 2017
Found a swap living donor using social media, friends, family.
New kidney in a paired donation swap July 26, 2017.
Her story ---> https://www.facebook.com/WantedKidneyDonor
Please watch her video: http://youtu.be/D9ZuVJ_s80Y
Living Donors Rock! http://www.livingdonorsonline.org -
News video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-7KvgQDWpU
Rerun
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 12242


Going through life tied to a chair!

« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2009, 04:43:18 AM »

Ewuuu.  I'm sure we can think of something better than that.

The movie "The Island" is better than that.  People are cloned and live in this Star Trek type place and when they win the lottery they "think" they get to go to this island type paradise when actually their original clone person needs an organ.... heart, liver, kidney.

                                       :waving;
Logged

paris
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 8859


« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2009, 12:22:50 PM »

When did 60 become the age of being disposible? 
Logged



It's not what you gather, but what you scatter that tells what kind of life you have lived.
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!