While I am not disagreeing about the drug industry in general, it looks like this study was published by Canadians in a Canadian journal. I know the Canadians generally don't like to lose their identity to the US.
Also, this site provides additional text to the story posted at Okarol's link, including more discussion of the possible negative effects
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=b716c8f2-4407-4f39-8de4-a4d1ca8b4cce"But recent studies have raised questions about whether erythropoietin, or "epo," might actually make underlying illnesses worse. A study published last year in the New England Journal of Medicine found that patients with kidney failure who were treated aggressively with the drug had higher risks of heart problems and death than those treated less aggressively. (note: this is where the earlier article ended the story)
Another study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology described a small Canadian trial in lung cancer patients that was stopped because those getting epo were dying sooner.
Following the studies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued an alert to cancer doctors and announced it would review the drug, sold under the brand names Epogen, Procrit and Aranesp. Worldwide sales of the drug, made by Amgen, Roche and Johnson & Johnson, top $9 billion.
When Zarychanski reviewed the existing medical research more closely, he discovered that efforts to treat anemia caused by chronic disease often do more harm than good. He pointed to evidence that suggests anemia is an evolutionary response to illness, occurring not just in humans, but in horses, dogs and zebra fish.
"The body has adapted over thousands of years to be anemic at times of stress because it needs to conserve energy," said Zarychanski. "It needs help to fight infection. And when you're anemic, bacteria doesn't grow so well in the blood. It's probably an evolutionary response to infection before we had antibiotics."
In general, healthy adults have red-blood-cell levels of 14 grams or more per 100 millilitres of blood, while patients are considered to need treatment if their levels are below 10 grams. Zarychanski argues patients with mild to moderate anemia - those with levels between 10 and 14 grams - would be better off not being treated.
"We should exercise some caution when thinking the best treatment is to automatically transfuse or give drugs to correct anemia," he said."
© Ottawa Citizen 2008