I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 25, 2024, 01:30:55 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
532606 Posts in 33561 Topics by 12678 Members
Latest Member: astrobridge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  I Hate Dialysis Message Board
|-+  Dialysis Discussion
| |-+  Dialysis: News Articles
| | |-+  Radiographic Scans with Intravenous Dye Rarely Cause Clinically Significant Kidn
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Radiographic Scans with Intravenous Dye Rarely Cause Clinically Significant Kidn  (Read 1592 times)
okarol
Administrator
Member for Life
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 100933


Photo is Jenna - after Disneyland - 1988

WWW
« on: May 30, 2008, 04:44:33 PM »

Radiographic Scans with Intravenous Dye Rarely Cause Clinically Significant Kidney Injury

Released: Tue 27-May-2008, 15:15 ET

Description
Radiographic procedures such as computed tomography (CT) scans that use intravenous dye rarely cause clinically significant acute kidney injury in patients with mild baseline kidney disease, according to a study appearing in the September 2008 issue of CJASN. The findings reveal that these procedures are safe for the large and growing number of individuals who undergo them as well as give physicians reassuring information on patient risk.


Newswise — Radiographic procedures such as computed tomography (CT) scans that use intravenous dye rarely cause clinically significant acute kidney injury in patients with mild baseline kidney disease, according to a study appearing in the September 2008 issue of the Clinical Journal of the American Society Nephrology (CJASN). The findings reveal that these procedures are safe for the large and growing number of individuals who undergo them as well as give physicians reassuring information on patient risk.

For some CT scans and other procedures used to visualize parts of the internal body, a contrast material such as dye is injected into a blood vessel so that various structures and organs can be seen more easily. Previous studies have shown that the administration of contrast dye into blood vessels can cause acute kidney injury, or the rapid loss of kidney function due to damage to the kidneys. However, this research has traditionally been conducted in patients undergoing angiographic procedures that are done to detect abnormalities in the blood vessels. Less is known about the risk of acute kidney injury in outpatients who receive intravenous dye for CT scans. This information would be valuable to physicians, because patients who are considered at risk of kidney injury from these procedures should receive certain preventive interventions.

To fill this knowledge gap, Dr. Steven Weisbord and his colleagues of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System and the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine attempted to determine the incidence of acute kidney injury due to intravenous dye in individuals undergoing CT scans. They conducted a prospective, observational study of 421 patients within the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System who did not have end-stage renal disease and who were scheduled to undergo CT scans with intravenous dye. They assessed kidney injury by measuring the amount of creatinine found in the blood. Creatinine is a muscle break-down product that is filtered by the kidneys; high levels in the blood indicate kidney dysfunction.

In following patients’ creatinine levels after the procedures, the researchers reported that only 0.5% of patients had a 50% or more increase in creatinine blood levels, and none had a 100% increase. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury was not uncommon in the subset of patients who were hospitalized or who had advanced kidney impairment prior to the CT scan. But kidney injury was very uncommon in outpatients with mild baseline kidney disease. Even when patients did develop contrast-induced acute kidney injury, none required dialysis and none were hospitalized or died because of the kidney disease.

“These observations have important implications for providers ordering and performing computed tomography and for future clinical trials of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing this radiographic procedure,” the authors write. They note that their findings will help physicians determine which patients are at risk for acute kidney injury and will help ensure that intravenous dye is used in the safest possible manner.

The study, entitled “Incidence and Outcomes of Contrast-Induced AKI Following Computed Tomography,” is available online at http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/ and will appear in print in the September issue of the CJASN.

The American Society of Nephrology (ASN) is a not-for-profit organization of 11,000 physicians and scientists dedicated to the study of nephrology and committed to providing a forum for the promulgation of information regarding the latest research and clinical findings on kidney diseases. ASN publishes the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN), CJASN, and the Nephrology Self-Assessment Program (NephSAP). In January 2009, ASN will launch a newsmagazine.

http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/541157/?sc=rsmn
Logged


Admin for IHateDialysis 2008 - 2014, retired.
Jenna is our daughter, bad bladder damaged her kidneys.
Was on in-center hemodialysis 2003-2007.
7 yr transplant lost due to rejection.
She did PD Sept. 2013 - July 2017
Found a swap living donor using social media, friends, family.
New kidney in a paired donation swap July 26, 2017.
Her story ---> https://www.facebook.com/WantedKidneyDonor
Please watch her video: http://youtu.be/D9ZuVJ_s80Y
Living Donors Rock! http://www.livingdonorsonline.org -
News video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-7KvgQDWpU
Chris
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 9219


WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2008, 11:42:07 PM »

Study was used on healthy people, not peopl with lower renal function present or ones who had a transplant. When I started to read this, I thought this would be good news, but then as I read more, the details showed otherwise. I wonder if they are studying this more.
Logged

Diabetes -  age 7

Neuropathy in legs age 10

Eye impairments and blindness in one eye began in 95, major one during visit to the Indy 500 race of that year
   -glaucoma and surgery for that
     -cataract surgery twice on same eye (2000 - 2002). another one growing in good eye
     - vitrectomy in good eye post tx November 2003, totally blind for 4 months due to complications with meds and infection

Diagnosed with ESRD June 29, 1999
1st Dialysis - July 4, 1999
Last Dialysis - December 2, 2000

Kidney and Pancreas Transplant - December 3, 2000

Cataract Surgery on good eye - June 24, 2009
Knee Surgery 2010
2011/2012 in process of getting a guide dog
Guide Dog Training begins July 2, 2012 in NY
Guide Dog by end of July 2012
Next eye surgery late 2012 or 2013 if I feel like it
Home with Guide dog - July 27, 2012
Knee Surgery #2 - Oct 15, 2012
Eye Surgery - Nov 2012
Lifes Adventures -  Priceless

No two day's are the same, are they?
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!