I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 27, 2024, 11:49:19 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
532606 Posts in 33561 Topics by 12678 Members
Latest Member: astrobridge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  I Hate Dialysis Message Board
|-+  Dialysis Discussion
| |-+  Dialysis: News Articles
| | |-+  It's the reason why
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: It's the reason why  (Read 2584 times)
cassandra
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 4974


When all else fails run in circles, shout loudly

« on: July 11, 2016, 02:49:23 AM »

So I read this,

 
Oxford JournalsMedicine & Health Nephrology Dialysis TransplantationAdvance Access10.1093/ndt/gfw099

The mode of sensitization and its influence on allograft outcomes in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients
Robert R. Redfield1, Joseph R. Scalea1, Tiffany J. Zens1, Didier A. Mandelbrot2, Glen Leverson1, Dixon B. Kaufman1 and Arjang Djamali1,2
+ Author Affiliations

1Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
2Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Robert R. Redfield; E-mail: rrredfield@wisc.edu
Received January 24, 2016.
Accepted April 5, 2016.
Abstract

Background We sought to determine whether the mode of sensitization in highly sensitized patients contributed to kidney allograft survival.

Methods An analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset involving all kidney transplants between 1997 and 2014 was undertaken. Highly sensitized adult kidney transplant recipients [panel reactive antibody (PRA) ≥98%] were compared with adult, primary non-sensitized and re-transplant recipients. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used to determine allograft survival rates. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to determine the association of graft loss with key predictors.

Results Fifty-three percent of highly sensitized patients transplanted were re-transplants. Pregnancy and transfusion were the only sensitizing event in 20 and 5%, respectively. The 10-year actuarial graft survival for highly sensitized recipients was 43.9% compared with 52.4% for non-sensitized patients, P < 0.001. The combination of being highly sensitized by either pregnancy or blood transfusion increased the risk of graft loss by 23% [hazard ratio (HR) 1.230, confidence interval (CI) 1.150–1.315, P < 0.001], and the combination of being highly sensitized from a prior transplant increased the risk of graft loss by 58.1% (HR 1.581, CI 1.473–1.698, P < 0.001).

Conclusions The mode of sensitization predicts graft survival in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients (PRA ≥98%). Patients who are highly sensitized from re-transplants have inferior graft survival compared with patients who are highly sensitized from other modes of sensitization.

 
Logged

I started out with nothing and I still have most of it left

1983 high proteinloss in urine, chemo, stroke,coma, dialysis
1984 double nephrectomy
1985 transplant from dad
1998 lost dads kidney, start PD
2003 peritineum burst, back to hemo
2012 start Nxstage home hemo
2020 start Gambro AK96

       still on waitinglist, still ok I think
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!