Yes, we've discussed this at some length.
Sec. Azar's father has been a dialysis patient, thus the impetus for this initiative.
I find it rather disappointing that the priority seems to be how these improvements will be paid for, stressing financial "incentives" that would lead to better patient care as if there is no "moral incentive" in the first place. I guess there isn't, really. The discussion still seems to be all about money.
We as a community do have questions. Exactly how will this initiative result in more available organs for transplantation?
Are we talking more patients doing home hemo or home PD?
Who are seen as the "disruptors in the field"?
When we speak of "Congress", we're really speaking of Mitch McConnell. It is hard to see any sort of funding request, especially if it originates in the House, being put to the floor in a McConnell controlled Senate, especially when he has already promised that he'd put nothing on the floor for debate until the general election next year.
I wish we could see more of President Trump himself talking about what he is having Sec. Azar actually do. I've not heard from him directly. If anyone has a link to a story where he has acknowledged the problem and has signaled his personal support, I'd like to see it.
I have not had the time to read this yet, and it may have already been posted here on IHD, but here's a link to the CMS proposals:
https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/proposed-end-stage-renal-disease-treatment-choices-etc-mandatory-model