I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Dialysis Discussion => Dialysis: Medicare/Insurance => Topic started by: Shaks24 on November 18, 2016, 12:22:23 PM
-
With the recent turn of events in DC there is a lot of speculation backed by comments and pending legislation to make some pretty drastic changes to Medicare as we know it. From what I can see it would mainly effect those under the age of 55 and younger and those who are not already on medicare. Its sounds like the goal is to privatize medicare with Medicare Advantage type policies supported by vouchers to help seniors and the disabled to pay the premiums. One of the big concerns is that the vouchers will not keep up with the rate of inflation of policy premiums resulting in the seniors and disabled picking up the extra expense when policies go up. Also a gradual raising of the age to qualify to 67 from 65. Has anyone else been following this and do you have any thoughts on the matter? I think its important for those of us on Medicare to pay attention as these plans will have an impact on how many of us cover the cost of our treatments. These Medicare "modernization" ideas have been around for a while but kept in check by divided government. Now with united GOP control it looks like a very possible reality.
-
Yes, many of us have been following this because Paul Ryan has been talking about it for some years now.
The idea is to gradually deprive Medicare of resources so that those who want to privatize it can some day soon say, "Look! It's broken!! It's going broke! Our party is going to fix it!"
If you want to envision what it might look like, you can read this about the gradual privatization of Britain's NHS. This is coming soon to a theater near you
https://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2015/oct/02/nhs-one-way-road-privatisation#comments
-
Privatization of Medicare with vouchers will increase the income redistribution aspect of public policy if those who have saved are punished by getting a lower voucher. Another issue is that all medical treatment already has a "Medicare tax" built in - MDs and hospitals tend to accept Medicare despite very low payment rates. If private policies do not get access to Medicare rates, costs will go through the roof (just look at the cost of private pay vs. private insurance vs. medicare payments for a single dialysis treatment).
-
I've heard that Trump is against this. Just because Paul Ryan is he ain't President. I don't see this happening.
Don't worry.
-
The Medicare voting block is so strong and solid that the country will go into receivership before those get cut off.
The trick is increasing cost to the recipient in a manner that leaves most of those people thinking that someone else is going to be paying the increase, no them.
-
Is Medicare expensive hell yea. It is also the most cost effective medical delivery system in the US. The one exception is the part D perscription Plan created in the W Bush administration. Only one insurance plan is barred from either negotiating or setting price limits. That is Medicare Part D it's prices are set at full list and people wonder why list prices have been going up so fast.
-
I was so worried about this, Medicare and Social Security are both in jeopardy with Trump in !! We all knows he lies so just because he says he isn't touching it,means nothing! Look at all the other things he has "changed his mind on " !!!! Medicare and Social Security are the only reason I have not lost my home and everything else . I am 70 years old and my husband is on his second kidney transplant, so it's been nice not to worry about paying for medical and other stuff ,with the SS income and Medicare it's working for us . I have had my home for 43 years,and it is a very modest home , but I know if you end up unable to pay medical, you get a lean on your house . I hate that Trump ,he is going to make rich richer and middle class poor and poor won't make it at all ! The writing is already on the wall , check out his tax plans . :Kit n Stik;
-
I hate that Trump ,he is going to make rich richer and middle class poor and poor won't make it at all !
He, Ryan and Trump supporters (who live in la la land) will have a lot of blood on their hands when the elderly, sick, disabled and poor start committing suicide in droves. Of course, he won't feel a thing as he has no capacity for empathy and he has HIS so screw the rest of you! And actually, that is the GOP health plan. Just die. What a cruel and heartless lot.
sp mod Cas
-
Look at all the other things he has "changed his mind on " !!!!
Like going from "repeal Obamacare on day 1" to "keep the pre-existing condition and age 26 features of Obamacare".
The man is already stating to get a dose of reality now that he is off the campaign trail.
-
I am extremely concerned about how Medicare and Health Insurance in general are going to be changed under the current administration. Being 28 and on Medicare due to the kidney issues, I fear my type of situation is going to be the first to get cut. Also, changing Obamacare is going to make it much harder for me to get other types of health insurance if I don't find full time employment with benefits (something else I fear is going to change under this administration).
I'm very concerned and extremely frustrated with the lack of young people involved in politics. It's easy to make those policies when you aren't the one who is going to feel the effect of the changes.
-
Every thing I have been able to find on it indicates that those 55 or older and those already on medicare can stay on it as it is. I spend about 600 a month on my Medicare B, Gap policy and prescription policy but it works real well to cover everything. Prior to the ACA I was never able to purchase decent insurance due to pre existing conditions. Its just scary to see the possibility of health care coverage being up in the air again. I guess we will not know for sure until the legislation is put forward and passed into law. Medicare is a sacred cow to so many that have already paid in on it for many years so I hope they move with caution on this. At the same time it faces funding issues down the road. Funny thing to me is that the Ryan plan sounds a lot like Obamacare for seniors and the disabled. Go figure!
-
I remember
Obama saying. "if you like your doctor you will keep your doctor... if you like your insurance you will keep your insurance"
Not!! Affordable ?? Some health Premiums have tripled. Is he a liar? :thumbdown;
-
I don't know that it is Paul Ryan who will be putting granny and her family out on the street. Seattle is one of the biggest Liberal cities and yet, 80 year old grannies are having to work or else risk having to move into the largest tent city in America, which Seattle fondly refers to as "The Jungle".
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/the-new-needy-seattles-growth-has-people-seeking-help-for-the-first-time/
-
Good article:
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/11/18/GOP-Cuts-Medicare-May-Be-Next-After-Dismantling-Obamacare
-
http://www.ncpssm.org/
-
My Aunt is 83 and lives in Seattle. She invested in Starbucks the first year and Microsoft. It depends how you live the first 80 years of your life whether you are in a tent. There are retirement plans for everyone but if you don't choose to invest when you are young then it is Trump's fault?
Get off the tit.
-
Well, Prime Timer, maybe Paul Ryan can do something about Seattle's landlords who won't accept the housing vouchers.
-
My Aunt is 83 and lives in Seattle. She invested in Starbucks the first year and Microsoft. It depends how you live the first 80 years of your life whether you are in a tent. There are retirement plans for everyone but if you don't choose to invest when you are young then it is Trump's fault?
Get off the tit.
Sometimes when you're young, you don't have the resources to invest. When it comes to a choice between throwing money in to your IRA or putting food on the table and keeping the lights on.. which one would you pick?
-
Sometimes when you're young, you don't have the resources to invest. When it comes to a choice between throwing money in to your IRA or putting food on the table and keeping the lights on.. which one would you pick?
It all depends.
I've seen young people who "don't have money to invest" because they needed a "nice place to live", a "nice car", etc.... instead of sharing a place with a few roommates and driving an older used car (techniques I used to max out my IRA when I started my first fill time job in 1980). To those people, I say sympathy is located in the dictionary between s--t and syphlis. Ditto for those who feel they "need" to live in a high cost city like SF, Seattle, NYC, Boston, etc. instead of moving to a lower cost part of the country.
Those that are doing all they can, including living the lifestyle they can afford, rather than the lifestyle they feel they "deserve", have my sympathy - particularly those whose working potential is reduced by ESRD at an early age.
-
Get a second part-time job. There's an idea.
:waving;
-
So I don't live in the US, but I'm pretty sure that it's world wide that you might be able to blame maybe 5% of poor people for being poor. But you can't seriously expect to base that on any facts. There's quite some facts about in national statistics f.e. that most rich people were born into richness.
:twocents;
-
I haven't looked, but I would bet that AARP is looking in what is going on with both SS and Medicare. I joined, it is one of the very few organizations that I belong to, other than Veterans.
-
To change SS or Medicare requires a change to the law. This must pass through the Senate at some point. There are currently 48 Democratic Senators.
That's enough to block any legislation that the Democrats want to stop. It requires 60 votes to end a filibuster.
-
I think Ryan talked of using budget reconciliation to make changes to Obamacare and Medicare. Social Security can not be changed through reconciliation. Lately they have been talking about full steam ahead on Obamacare repeal in January but delaying the effective date until they agree on a replacement plan. The medicare reform talk seems to have chilled out. Specially in the senate as a number of GOP senators have said medicare reform is not the priority right now as they will have enough on their plate for now. I guess time will tell what their actual plans are as we see bills flow out of the house after Trump is in office. I think its fair to say that things are going to change. My heart goes out to those on Obamacare that may be anxious about how they will keep their healthcare coverage. At least those who like it will be ok for 2017.
-
To those who feel that these changes are fair, I worked from 18 till 64 in good paying jobs and I paid SSA taxes for 46 years, during that time I was told no mater what your SSA benefits were safe. In 2004 AT&T froze my pension to 1992 levels and the Bush administration approved the change. So when I was laid off my pension was the same it was 12 years before I retired. Now while I get half a pension the new group of Yahoo!'s want to hit my SS benefits.holy batman now it's my fault for not having a large saving plan. That's kind of heartless.
-
That's kind of heartless.
"Heartless" is the GOP way. They have ice water running through their veins.
-
it's my fault for not having a large saving plan. That's kind of heartless.
SS benefits should be calculated based on what you put in + investment return - reasonable premium for disability. The problem is reallocation of wealth. Privitization done properly would not increase or decrease the pool, just get rid of the redistirbutionist nature of the program.
-
I'm scared as hell for what that Trump is going to do to all of us ! He is already tweeting nasty stuff about China, giving millions to big business to stay here, not go to Mexico , others will want the same thing, so the $$$ has to come from somewhere , I fear it will come from the most vulnerable people in our country! Re vamping Medicare and SSI / SSDI will most certainly mean less benefit for us than we have now.
-
Trump has already indicated he is to chicken to kick 25 year old "children" off their parents insurance policy, so I every much doubt he will be squaring off against AARP and the disabled community.
-
benefit
Those of us who value our "benefits" should be using the term "earned benefits" when talking about SS and Medicare. The conservative right frames the argument their way when they refer to "entitlements." Language matters. The word "entitlement" is imbued with connotations of taking and takers and parasites who sit back and expect money rather than a benefit that most of us have spent a lifetime paying into and earning. Some on this site and on the right are obsessed with "redistribution" of their precious wealth from the rich to the less fortunate. That is selfish and false. If anything our economy has been busy redistributing wealth FROM the less fortunate to those on top. And that is why America is now reeling from serious income and wealth inequality and all the problems that follow.
-
I agree with "earned benefits". What annoys me is that I worked as long as I could instead of taking disability, paid more into Medicare than I would have not working, and my "thank you" for paying the extra tax is a $50/month surcharge on my Medicare as a penalty for not taking disability.
-
I agree with "earned benefits". What annoys me is that I worked as long as I could instead of taking disability, paid more into Medicare than I would have not working, and my "thank you" for paying the extra tax is a $50/month surcharge on my Medicare as a penalty for not taking disability.
Wait, what? What kind of penalty? For not taking SSDI? My goal is the same as yours, to keep on working for as long as possible. I'm not currently on dialysis, I'm currently transplanted w/a low functioning kidney and am back on the list. I'm 43 and have been doing this ESRD thing since 37.
KarenInWA
-
I agree with "earned benefits". What annoys me is that I worked as long as I could instead of taking disability, paid more into Medicare than I would have not working, and my "thank you" for paying the extra tax is a $50/month surcharge on my Medicare as a penalty for not taking disability.
Wait, what? What kind of penalty? For not taking SSDI? My goal is the same as yours, to keep on working for as long as possible. I'm not currently on dialysis, I'm currently transplanted w/a low functioning kidney and am back on the list. I'm 43 and have been doing this ESRD thing since 37.
KarenInWA
I'd guess that is an older rate for the Income Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA)? The standard Medicare monthly premium is $121.80 and is locked in at that price up to about $86k in income, after that you pay more on a sliding scale based on income up to $389.80 total per month.
https://www.medicare.gov/your-medicare-costs/part-b-costs/part-b-costs.html
I pay this type of additional charge and its a "tax" I support. I'm lucky enough to have income, its ok that I pay more for this insurance so others without my resources are able to pay less.
-
Wait, what? What kind of penalty? For not taking SSDI?
I am charged a higher rate for Medicare since I worked in 2015 than I would if I had been on disability, or even just unemployed and not paying taxes, in 2015.
-
It's worse than that, friends. I read financial newsletters and almost all of them are predicting a financial collapse. It's mathematically imminent as the banks continue their wild bets. One of the predictions is that social security and medicare will no longer be funded as the dollar falls into a free fall. A domino will ripple through the economy. Things will be worse than the great depression. I'm afraid they'll stop paying for dialysis as one of their first budget cuts.
-
I read financial newsletters and almost all of them are predicting a financial collapse.
Yeah, and I get newsletters telling me that all world leaders are alien lizards in fake human costumes. I don't believe those newsletters either.
This subject has come up before in another thread. My reply there still holds. It was:
However the important thing to remember is that it is bloody unlikely that the US will default. Sure it is possible, but the earth being hit with a DK* in our lifetime is more likely, and that would kill everyone off. But you don't worry about that do you? So why worry about the US becoming insolvent?
*DK = "dinosaur killer", a meteor big enough to wipe out the dominant life form (humans) hitting the earth and doing for us what is believed a previous one did for the dinosaurs. It is always a real and present danger, statistically it should have happened by now, so we are overdue.
-
The response will not be to discontinue dialysis or Medicare but make such benefits increasingly means tested.
Imagine having your social security cut or having a massive dialysis copay because you had the financial discipline to contribute heavily to your 401K or IRA. In fact, the ability to means test (newspeak for income redistribution) is why the Democrats are opposed to any privatization that gives those who contribute to social security title to their assets rather than an obligation the government can change at any time.