I Hate Dialysis Message Board

Off-Topic => Site Requests, Comments, Technical Help. => Topic started by: chessicle on January 29, 2007, 11:23:48 AM

Title: Spell checker
Post by: chessicle on January 29, 2007, 11:23:48 AM
Has anyone else noticed that the spell checker doesn't recognise the word "Nephrologist"?  Seems a bit ironic to me, on a site such as this!
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: Epoman on January 29, 2007, 02:33:17 PM
Has anyone else noticed that the spell checker doesn't recognise the word "Nephrologist"?  Seems a bit ironic to me, on a site such as this!

It is ironic isn't. But what's more ironic is that you spelled "recognise" (recognize) wrong when the spell check did in fact tell you it was wrong. Or did you not use spell check?

- Epoman
Owner/Admin
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: chessicle on January 30, 2007, 01:58:57 PM
Only Americans spell it with a "z", dude.
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: okarol on January 30, 2007, 02:32:30 PM
from m-w.com Merriam-Webster online dictionary:

recognise
One entry found for recognise.

Main Entry: rec·og·nise
chiefly British variant of RECOGNIZE
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: kitkatz on January 30, 2007, 04:20:11 PM
Oh God Here we go again!   :popcorn; :popcorn;  Shall I put out the lawn chairs, again?
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: Epoman on January 30, 2007, 04:42:00 PM
Oh God Here we go again!   :popcorn; :popcorn;  Shall I put out the lawn chairs, again?

LOL, nah don't worry I'll keep my mouth shut.  ;D
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: Sluff on January 30, 2007, 06:08:04 PM
 :rofl; :rofl;
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: tamara on February 05, 2007, 01:50:20 AM
from m-w.com Merriam-Webster online dictionary:

recognise
One entry found for recognise.

Main Entry: rec·og·nise
chiefly British variant of RECOGNIZE



Yes I was going to bring this up earlier, but then thought.....................don't go there LOL

I like how it's got " British variant", how can the "English English" be the variant, not the "American English" spelling?     :banghead;
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: BigSky on February 05, 2007, 08:50:16 AM
It might be because the Merriam-Webster dictionary has it roots in America. 

It was how Webster was a stout Federalist and  viewed that the British aristocracy  had corrupted the English language in its grammar and its spelling thus creating their own standard for proper spelling and pronunciation.

In essence he didn't feel Americans should be burdened by this old way of thinking and needed a new way, an American way, a way of the people, not unlike his thoughts as  a Federalist and how the US should be a American country,  a country run by its people, not the British. ;)

 :beer1;
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: chessicle on February 06, 2007, 09:55:04 AM
Perhaps we should accept that English is spoken in England, American in America, Australian in Australia - but how far do you take it?  Scottish in Scotland?  Are we that different from the English?  Should it become "British"?  That's a terrible idea.  And of course Welsh is a completely different language altogether anyway!
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: okarol on February 06, 2007, 10:28:34 AM
Has anyone else noticed that the spell checker doesn't recognise the word "Nephrologist"?  Seems a bit ironic to me, on a site such as this!

The fun part is that you are given the following choices as replacement words:

Neurologist
Numerologist

Yeah, much more likely to need help with nerves or numbers!


Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: billoggblog on February 28, 2007, 04:34:29 PM
So! Let me see if I've got this right:- :rant;
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: billoggblog on February 28, 2007, 04:42:46 PM
The word "Recognise" was recognised, as the recognised spelling for the word Recognised in the English language before it was recognised by the Americans that recognised should be spelled recognized in the American language.
IS THAT RIGHT? :rofl; :rofl; :rofl; :rofl; :rofl; :rofl; :rofl; :rofl;

Now that this is truly A global site, we have to recognis/ze the occasional idiosyncrasy
Even the Google spell checker recognises both!
HEY! why should I care I'm Scottish..........................I started writing the way I spoke no-one would understand A b****y word!
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: billoggblog on February 28, 2007, 04:44:32 PM
 :yahoo; :yahoo; :yahoo; :rofl; :rofl; :rofl; :rofl; :rofl; :urcrazy;
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: chessicle on March 08, 2007, 09:52:26 AM
:yahoo; :yahoo; :yahoo; :rofl; :rofl; :rofl; :rofl; :rofl; :urcrazy;

Ah prob'ly wud.  Gie it a try!  Ah'm no a teuchter, mind.

(Not spell checked)
(And it's quoted the wrong entry; I meant the one two above)
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: kitkatz on March 08, 2007, 11:09:48 AM
God help us!
Title: Re: Spell checker
Post by: mymoonring on March 24, 2007, 03:07:39 PM
LOL I have used spell checker and matched it with a dictionary. And i  have  to say its not a purfect world LOL  :banghead;