I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 24, 2024, 04:46:31 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
532606 Posts in 33561 Topics by 12678 Members
Latest Member: astrobridge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  I Hate Dialysis Message Board
|-+  Dialysis Discussion
| |-+  Dialysis: Medicare/Insurance
| | |-+  Why is DaVita billing our insurer thousands for home hemo?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Why is DaVita billing our insurer thousands for home hemo?  (Read 1919 times)
NCspinner
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25

« on: January 09, 2019, 03:53:12 PM »

I have tried asking our nephrologist about this at the home hemo clinic and she just says "It's a numbers game." That's the same reply she gives when we ask about the astronomical fees our hospital tries to charge for fistula-grams. When we get a statement from our "Medicare Advantage Plan" insurer, it shows that DaVita has been billed several thousand dollars several times a week for my husband's dialysis ... which we are doing at home with myself as the unpaid provider.
The insurer dismisses these claims so the balance is "0" at the end of the pages of charges, but it is unsettling. If it's a numbers game, somehow the patients & caregivers are the pawns.  What's going on?
Logged
PrimeTimer
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2401


« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2019, 07:25:49 PM »

Why is DaVita billing your insurance thousands of dollars? Because they can.

While doing dialysis at home saves them money it still costs a lot. And until your husband reaches the 30-month mark and has to make Medicare his primary insurance and your other plan moves into secondary position, they will continue to bill for thousands of dollars. Meantime, if your hubby is getting insurance from an employer (either yours or his employer) I suggest reading up on "Self Insured vs Fully Insured" employer plans. As an employee your work will be closely scrutinized because the moment they can find a reason to fire you they will. They do not want to continue paying out high claims for dialysis and all things related, which is what happened to my own husband. Good luck to you. 
Logged

Husband had ESRD with Type I Diabetes -Insulin Dependent.
I was his care-partner for home hemodialysis using Nxstage December 2013-July 2016.
He went back to doing in-center July 2016.
After more than 150 days of being hospitalized with complications from Diabetes, my beloved husband's heart stopped and he passed away 06-08-21. He was only 63.
Michael Murphy
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2109


« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2019, 11:21:02 PM »

For in center hemo $370 (Medicare), $1500 (Private Insurance}, and $4500 for no insurance.  The Medicare rate provides a modest profit margin for the service provider, the Private Insurance provides a obscene profit to the service provider, the no insurance rate assumes most people can’t afford it so after bankruptcy for the patient the service provider gets a 4500 dollar tax deduction which should equate to a 1500 dollar reduction in the taxes the service provider pays or in reality a 1500 dollar profit.  The cost sheets you are looking at are designed by Medicare and all companies serving Medicare clients follow that format.
Logged
Simon Dog
Administrator/Owner
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3460


« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2019, 05:15:40 AM »

My insurance (pre-medicare) paid the uninsured asking price ($5050 per treatment) at a DaVita clinic I used while traveling.

It's like cars and college educations - figure out the exact highest amount each customer is willing to pay and collect it.  In economic terms, it is called reducing consumer surplus.

As to employers - it depends on how their internal charging systems and accountability systems are set up.  When I was at a huge (50K person) company it was a non-issue, since department managers had budgetary accountability for the premium, not the self-insured claims.  Smaller employers have a greater danger because the hiring manager directly sees or pays the claims or increased premiums the next renewal cycle.   This almost happened to a friend whose wife had cancer, but he was the CEO so it was a non-issue for him.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2019, 05:17:59 AM by Simon Dog » Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!