I'm 43 with a wife, a 12 year old daughter, and a 7 year old son (at home). I can't imagine doing any longer on my machine than necessary. 1hr setup + 3 .5 hr dialysis + .5 hr cleanup X 6 days a week + misc. time dealing with supplies/boxes/appointments/ectI never knew how time consuming it would be, and with two kids at home, I have very little spare time as it is.
Quote from: obsidianom on June 27, 2014, 07:47:31 AMWhy are you running your blood flow so fast? 420 really stuns the heart and can damage the fistula. Also at 18 LPH at 40 liters you are only dialyzing about 2 hours and 15 ,minutes? If that is true then you are really going very short on your time. Just my opinion but it seems a bit off.When I first got the "S" unit, it was shipped to my clinic (1st one my clinic had seen). So I started using in in-center so that we could all learn how to use it. 420 was the number my nurse was using when I was in-center, so I just keep using it. I've done 2 sets of labs since I've been on it and everything seems good.
Why are you running your blood flow so fast? 420 really stuns the heart and can damage the fistula. Also at 18 LPH at 40 liters you are only dialyzing about 2 hours and 15 ,minutes? If that is true then you are really going very short on your time. Just my opinion but it seems a bit off.
We didn't ask for it but we are getting the new NxStage "S" Cycler in two weeks. We are being told that we will be using SAK's 402 for 30 Liter treatments, 5 days a week. (Right now on the System One Cycler we do 30 Liter treatments for approx 3.35 hours 5 days a week at a Blood Flow Rate of 350-380). We are being told that we can remain at a Blood Flow Rate of 350-380 and 30 Liters but that the new "S" cycler will run the volume of dialysate faster thus, shorter time on the machine (and according to others comments here, that seems to be true). BUT...I am still confused or rather, a little bit suspicious about the new cycler running dialysate faster without requiring the blood flow rate to also be adjusted to a "faster" rate to avoid alarms. Or, is this really true...faster dialysate rate but same slow blood flow rate?? By the way, of course, we do understand that more time on the machine means more dialysis and more dialysis is always better but that's a separate issue for us right now (husband has been getting very good labs with his current treatment plan). Anyways, I can give NxStage a call but am hoping to hear from one of you first...your thoughts and/or answers or experience with the new "S" cycler. Thanks.
You can run faster dialysate and get better clearance in a given amount of time, but probably less than if you run the same amount of dialysate slower. The real way to improve is to run the dialysate faster and use the extra time to allow for a larger Rx. If you simply increase the speed to lower the time, and do not increase your total dialysate volume, you are probably getting less effective treatment. QuoteThere is some evidence to suggest that total time is very important, and you don't get a free lunch even though may have the same Kt/V running the solution at a higher speed.One catch - the faster rates are supported only by the PureFlow. You will need an Rx than runs at a slower rate for your "bag contingency plan".
There is some evidence to suggest that total time is very important, and you don't get a free lunch even though may have the same Kt/V running the solution at a higher speed.One catch - the faster rates are supported only by the PureFlow. You will need an Rx than runs at a slower rate for your "bag contingency plan".
Quote from: PrimeTimer on July 24, 2014, 12:03:15 PMWe didn't ask for it but we are getting the new NxStage "S" Cycler in two weeks. We are being told that we will be using SAK's 402 for 30 Liter treatments, 5 days a week. (Right now on the System One Cycler we do 30 Liter treatments for approx 3.35 hours 5 days a week at a Blood Flow Rate of 350-380). We are being told that we can remain at a Blood Flow Rate of 350-380 and 30 Liters but that the new "S" cycler will run the volume of dialysate faster thus, shorter time on the machine (and according to others comments here, that seems to be true). BUT...I am still confused or rather, a little bit suspicious about the new cycler running dialysate faster without requiring the blood flow rate to also be adjusted to a "faster" rate to avoid alarms. Or, is this really true...faster dialysate rate but same slow blood flow rate?? By the way, of course, we do understand that more time on the machine means more dialysis and more dialysis is always better but that's a separate issue for us right now (husband has been getting very good labs with his current treatment plan). Anyways, I can give NxStage a call but am hoping to hear from one of you first...your thoughts and/or answers or experience with the new "S" cycler. Thanks. If you are doing well with current prescription , why change anything. Just use the new machine at the same settings as the old one. Going faster with the same volume dialysate gains nothing and probably loses some effectiveness.
Prime timer, the other issue is your dialysate. You are using only 30 liters. My tiny wife who weighs 55 kilos uses 30 liters. So unless your husband is that small, I am betting you are not using enough volume. That may explain the numbers. My wifes Kt/V (for all its worth) is over 3.0. That is with 5 days on nxstage at 3.5 hours , blood speed 340. Anyone bigger than my wife should be on higher volume, especially males.
You don't need a system S to run 40 liters in 4 hours. I run that since 2009 on the regular System One right now.I would like to go to a higher dialysate, but the sodium levels are too high for me in the dialysate and I get a salt load whenever I go to 45 liters which I also have done on the regular System One. In fact, I ran 47 liters once in about the same time as the 40 liters with an FF of 55%. If you have the System S, it can go up to 18 Liters per hour. Running it at 15 liters per hour, you could easily do 60 liters in 4 hours. That will come close to approximating in-center machine clearances. That was my goal but the sodium levels are simply too high.