I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 25, 2024, 01:55:05 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
532606 Posts in 33561 Topics by 12678 Members
Latest Member: astrobridge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  I Hate Dialysis Message Board
|-+  Dialysis Discussion
| |-+  Dialysis: General Discussion
| | |-+  Understanding the NxStage Filtration Fraction
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Understanding the NxStage Filtration Fraction  (Read 6303 times)
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« on: April 11, 2011, 02:23:48 PM »

By Peter Laird, MD

Perhaps the single most commonly asked question by patients on home dialysis with the NxStage System One is "what is your FF?" The answers vary greatly without anyone in consensus over what is the best filtration fraction (FF). To answer that question, defining the terms is in order. The filtration fraction is actually a fixed ratio between the blood flow rate (BFR) and the dialysate flow rate (DFR) expressed in a fraction. For example if you have a BFR of 400 ml/min and you set your dialysate flow rate at 35% of that figure, the actual dialysate flow rate is 140 ml/min.  The filtration fraction is thus expressed in this example as 35%.

The NxStage System One is designed on a low dialysate flow rate to theoretically maximize the dialysate at a "100%" efficiency.  Anyone that studies physics understands readily that there is never a system that is 100% efficient. However, looking at dialysate flow curves and levels of urea removal, there are higher and lower levels of efficiency depending on how fast the dialysate flow rate is set.

Evaluating this well done slide by Wellbound, it is evident that at the right side of the curve, the efficiencies plateau so that increasing the dialysate flow rate does not increase urea clearances. Likewise, on the left side of the curve, as the flow rate is increased, there is a corresponding degree of increased urea clearance. The NxStage System One utilizes this increased efficiency of solute clearance for their low dialysate volumes compared to in-center machines. The line begins to diverge from highly efficient to lower efficiency around 200 ml/min dialysate flow rates. It is thus reasonable to set a maximum dialysate flow rate of 200 ml/min as the upper boundary.

I personally utilized this information in the design of my own NxStage short daily dialysis program where I started not with the FF or filtration fraction but with the dialysate flow rate directly.   Keeping the goal of less than 200 ml/min in agreement with the underlying goals of the NxStage System One, I took the FF to it's maximum parameters and kept my blood flow rate at a lower level. In many ways, time on the machine per week is the most important factor since phosphorus (PO4) and many of the middle molecules such as B-2 microglobulin are time dependent unlike urea which easily cleared quickly.

Fitting the NxStage System One into your daily life is in large part predicated on the amount of time per session and how many days a week it is completed. Many papers over the last two decades show conclusively that the longer per session a patient stays on the machine, the better the outcomes, short daily dialysis can be too short. Discussing all of the factors involved in deciding what your "best FF" will be is determined by your goals of therapy, time allowed to these treatments as well as the configuration of the NxStage System One. Finding the optimal FF is thus a very personal quest in conjunction with the recommendations of your medical team taking into consideration how the NxStage System One dialysate flow rates are designed.

http://www.hemodoc.com/2011/04/understanding-the-nxstage-filtration-fraction.html
Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
tyefly
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2016


This will be me...... Next spring.... I earned it.

« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2011, 02:44:12 PM »

thx for the info...   Since time is the most important factor since phosphorus  and many of the middle molecules such as B-2 microglobulin are time dependent unlike urea which easily cleared quickly.. How much time does it take to reduce both of these... and also  why does urea come off so quickly while phosphorus takes longer... why does it take longer.. and how much longer..  is it better to do long dialysis on a daily basis or  shorter dialysis for more days of the week....  thx  again for the info Peter....
Logged

IgA Nephropathy   April 2009
CKD    May 2009
AV Fistula  June 2009
In-Center Dialysis   Sept 2009
Nxstage    Feb 2010
Extended Nxstage March 2011

Transplant Sept 2, 2011

  Hello from the Oregon Coast.....

I am learning to live close to the lives of my friends without ever seeing them. No miles of any measurement can separate your soul from mine.
- John Muir

The clearest way into the Universe is through a forest wilderness.
- John Muir
Hemodoc
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2110

WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2011, 03:25:05 PM »

thx for the info...   Since time is the most important factor since phosphorus  and many of the middle molecules such as B-2 microglobulin are time dependent unlike urea which easily cleared quickly.. How much time does it take to reduce both of these... and also  why does urea come off so quickly while phosphorus takes longer... why does it take longer.. and how much longer..  is it better to do long dialysis on a daily basis or  shorter dialysis for more days of the week....  thx  again for the info Peter....

It has to do with how large the molecules are, urea is a very small molecule relative to B-2 microglobulin.  PO4 acts like a middle molecule in its clearances.  In addition, these molecules reside in different "compartments." These compartments clear at different rates and the larger the molecule the longer it takes to clear.  That is why nocturnal dialysis on a daily basis is getting the best results.  Once again, the more dialysis you do, the better you clear these molecules.
Logged

Peter Laird, MD
www.hemodoc.info
Diagnosed with IgA nephropathy 1998
Incenter Dialysis starting 2-1-2007
Self Care in Center from 4-15-2008 to 6-2-2009
Started  Home Care with NxStage 6-2-2009 (Qb 370, FF 45%, 40L)

All clinical and treatment related issues discussed on this forum are for informational purposes only.  You must always secure your own medical teams approval for all treatment options before applying any discussions on this site to your own circumstances.
boswife
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2644


us and fam easter 2013

« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2011, 07:55:25 PM »

This all interests me so much but i do have a hard time grasping it.  Hubby just got his tx changed and as far as how he feels and how his results came out (after 3 weeks on new tx) it looks great.  So, if blood results stay good even though it went from  [23 dialysate, 400 bfr, 35ff, and 2:59 hr],    to   [ 20 dialytate, 390bfr, 320 ff at 2:56 hour ]?  Im planning on slowing his bfr to 380 or less just to get him at least 3 hours, but was also wondering if that will empty that dialysate sak any sooner?
Logged

im a california wife and cargiver to my hubby
He started dialysis April 09
We thank God for every day we are blessed to have together.
november 2010, patiently (ha!) waiting our turn for NxStage training
January 14,2011 home with NxStage
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!