Why, yes, they do. And, not only that, they also get put on to the transplant list and get new kidneys sometimes too.
Well, prison should not be a death sentence (OK, unless you're on death row, but that's a separate issue). Robert Downey Jr was released from prison to take an acting job, for chrissake, those of us who are not as well connected and fabulously rich at least deserve to get a treatment that few people would wish on anyone.
Refusing live saving treatment surely counts as cruel and unusual punishment.
Has a prisoner ever been given a new kidney only to be put back into prison? I very much doubt it, but I'd be curious to know. Can you just imagine the pre-eval appt with the social worker???
The way I understand it, is yes, they do dialysis on "guests" of the state. What I also heard is that they will do all they can to get said prisoner transplanted simply because it costs more to transport him to and from dialysis and to have two guards to watch him while there. It would be cheaper (for the state) to transplant hm a kidney and then put him in regular prison. I did see some internet article that basically said if you are a dialysis patient and want a transplant...go commit a felony and get arrested. They will get you transplanted and then when you're done serving your time, you will be free and will have a kidney. Course, you will also have a criminal record.
This is an action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, brought by Charles Lee Clark, a federal prisoner.1 Mr. Clark claims that the prison officials who are defendants are violating his rights under the Eighth Amendment through their deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. In particular, he asserts that he suffers from a disease known as chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), that the appropriate treatment is an autologous bone marrow transplant (ABMT), and that the defendants are refusing, without good reason, to afford him this treatment.The District Court dismissed the complaint, and we affirm. The reasons may be briefly stated. During the pendency of this appeal, Mr. Clark, who remains in federal custody, has in fact been allowed to take a step towards the ABMT. Cells from his bone marrow have been harvested and stored in a freezer. These cells will be available when and if Mr. Clark's condition takes a turn for the worse, and the need for the transplant arises. In the meantime, he appears to be receiving appropriate treatment.
In Trigo v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the offender wasdenied treatment for hepatitis C because eligibility for treatment wasbased on being in prison a set number of months and on the amountof time remaining on the offender’s sentence rather than on theoffender’s medical needs.55 The court found that there was sufficientevidence of deliberate indifference to allow the case to go to trial.56 Intwo cases involving the Federal Bureau of Prisons, another federalappellate court warned that the bureau’s blanket policy of denyingtransplants may violate offender’s Eighth Amendment rights.57 Thesecases are significant because they may indicate a shift in courts’interpretations of the importance of prison interests when weighedagainst offenders’ healthcare needs. Many prison systems currentlyhave policies or practices that operate to deny offenders publiclyfunded organ transplants. Further litigation may necessitatemeaningful changes in policies and practices.
Im not sure ,but i would think here in the UK someone would be in Prison Hospital ?
I just have a little input here. I kinda figure there's a possibilty that if someone where charged with say a non voilent type crime and the sentence was to be short, the courts might just give them probation because the cost of dialysis is CRAZYYY as you know. Hm...