okarol
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2009, 07:58:56 PM » |
|
I copied and pasted the article so it will last even if the link goes dead. Thanks Jill! okarol/admin
G I F T O F L I F E T R A N S P L A N T H O U S E VOLUME 9 | NO 3 | FA L L 2 0 0 9
Innovative Therapeutic Options for Sensitized Renal Transplant Candidates
Mark D. Stegall, M.D., Professor of Surgery
Antibodies are an important part of the body’s normal immune protection against infection. However, a blood transfusion or a prior transplant can stimulate the body to make antibodies against other people’s “tissue types” (the scientific term is Human Leukocyte Antigens or HLA). Antibodies against HLA can be a major problem for people who need a kidney transplant. When these antibodies are present in the bloodstream at high levels, they can attack and damage a new kidney early after transplant leading to early or late graft loss. Patients with these anti-HLA antibodies are termed “sensitized” and the problem is becoming more common—especially in people who require a second transplant after a long-functioning transplant fails. Historically, the risk of graft failure in patients who have antibodies against their donor’s tissue types has been so high that most transplant programs have considered this situation an absolute contraindication to kidney transplantation. Patients with this condition were left with few options. Most were placed on the deceased donor waiting list, but few ever received a donor against whom they did not have antibodies. Our group here at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, has become one of the world leaders in overcoming antibody barriers to kidney transplantation. Over the past decade, we have transplanted more than 200 kidneys into recipients with antibodies against donor HLA. Our main approach has been to remove the antibodies using a dialysis-like procedure called plasmaphersis. While this technique has resulted in successful kidney transplants in many sensitized patients, it is still complicated by high rates of antibody-mediated damage. In addition, we have found that some patients have antibody levels that are just too high for a successful transplant even with plasmapheresis. This situation stimulated our group to search for new therapeutic approaches to control anti-HLA antibody and to ameliorate its effects on the transplanted kidney. Fortunately, over the past year, two new studies that are testing new medicines are beginning to show promising results. Both are approved by the Mayo Institutional Review Board and both are still ongoing. The first study is intended to improve the outcomes of our existing plasmapheresis-based protocols. The rationale for using this new drug is based on the role of specialized serum proteins, called complement, in antibody-mediated damage. We have shown that when antibody binds to the kidney transplant, it activates complement. Early after transplant, it appears that antibody-activated complement actually does most of the damage to the kidney and not the antibody by itself. Thus, we hypothesized that blocking the body’s complement system might prevent antibody- mediated damage of the kidney. A novel drug called Eculizumab has been shown to block the activation of some types of complement. The drug is approved by the FDA for a rare condition involving abnormal complement activation (called Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria). Thus much experience exists with the drug and its safety profile is wellestablished. In this study, patients with anti-HLA antibody against their living donor undergo our usual plasmapheresis treatment. In addition, they receive eculizumab at the time of transplant and weekly for at least the first month after transplant. Compared to plasmapheresis alone in which antibody-mediated rejection occurred in almost 40% of patients in the first month after transplantation, none of the first 10 patients treated with eculizumab have developed rejection. All of the kidneys in eculizumab-treated recipients are functioning well and biopsies of the kidneys are normal. Most patients have been able to stop eculizumab within 3 months of transplant when anti-HLA antibody levels have decreased to safe levels. However, two patients have required longer treatment. The second study is aimed to help those patients with very high levels of antibody—too high for our existing plasmapheresis protocols to be successful. The medicine in this study is called Velcade and it is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Again, there is a large amount of clinical experience with this drug and its safety profile is well-known. In preliminary studies in my laboratory, we found that Velcade attacks normal antibody-producing cells and thus might decrease antibody production. Since the drug affects antibody secreting cells, the outcome that we are interested in monitoring is the number and function of anti-HLA antibody producing cells. These cells primarily live in the bone marrow, thus we need to take a bone marrow sample before and after Velcade treatment to measure its effect. If we detect a significant decrease in the cells making antibodies against HLA, then we start our usual plasmapheresis protocol to see if we can reduce serum antibody levels to a safe, transplantable level. The first iteration of this protocol involved a relatively short treatment schedule. Three of the first 4 patients treated responded. Of these 3, 2 have undergone transplant successfully and a third is scheduled. As we gain more experience with the drug in transplant patients, we are finding that longer treatments may be needed in patients with very high antibody levels. Currently, we are testing this longer treatment in 5 more patients and the results appear to be better than the shorter treatment regiment. We are hopeful that these patients will be transplanted as they complete the protocol. Importantly, the treatment and the bone marrow aspirations have been tolerated quite well. We are optimistic that these new treatment options will improve the outcome of kidney transplantation in sensitized patients. Without these innovative protocols, many patients may never receive a kidney transplant. Finally, our group also continues to explore other options for sensitized patients such as participation in a national paired donor program as they become available.
|