I have a question for the members of this forum about the quantity of dialysis we receive that is accosted by medicare - which is three times a week. How many of you would like to be dialyzed every other day. I realize this means alternating days every other week, but before you question the logistics of this - think of the benefits to your existence. Anyway I would just like to get a feel of how many of you would be interested in such an idea. Please note that there is no solution to this right now - but I feel that nothing is ever written in stone.
My question was for those who do not, or can not do dialysis at home. I probably could -but don't because I don't want to bring it home to my family. However there are others - the old , the foreigners who don't speak English well, or those who are just plain afraid. The government limits us to three tx's a week due to I'm guessing budget reasons within the medicare system. I always felt this was a 3 step up and 1 step back situation which is what hurts us in the long run.
It would be nice to have Sundays open to those who wanted an extra day. Maybe just one shift. But, it's not fiesable financially. It just costs too much to keep us alive at 3 days a week.
I am bringing this up as a new topic only because I asked a question which was - how many of us would like to get dialyzed every other day as opposed to three times a week. I explained that this would amount to 2 extra tx within a 4 week period. I asked not to think about the logistics of the scheduling. From the responses I received it seems that all responses said they would like to get dialyzed every other day - but there was concern about the scheduling of such an endeveour and to my surprise concern about whether the government could pay for this.My answer to these concerns are that any graduate with a business management degree or any one who has run his/her own business could create a scheduling of this in a matter of hours. As far as the number of seats available - well that doesn't change only the number of treatments for each patient - which in turn would create more jobs. Also people would probably need less time on the machine in the long run which would mean less stress in the unit. Then looking again at the long run (because we are all here for the long run) there would be less long term dialysis health problems which happen to be much more expensive to the government then 2 extra txs a month.Whether the government can afford to pay for this is like asking what is the price of your life. I did not want to bring politics into this equation - just a sense of what is best for us - the dialysis patients, which I thought was the purpose of this site. The three times a week tx was hard fought for by dialysis patients many years ago, and it was meant to keep people alive until they received a transplant. That was back when the "list" was a 1-2 year wait. Now, depending where you live, it can be up to a ten year wait. I believe it's time to update the thinking here - it's time to question the reasoning behind dialysis. Every other day tx brings what is known as a steady state to the body. That steady state means less variation in your clinical numbers - your blood values, which in turn means less toxin build up, less calcium/phosphorous build up, less fluid ,potassium.sodium and every other thing that hurts us buildup - which in turn means a better quality of life for us - the dialysis patient ...