I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 26, 2024, 03:30:58 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
532606 Posts in 33561 Topics by 12678 Members
Latest Member: astrobridge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  I Hate Dialysis Message Board
|-+  Dialysis Discussion
| |-+  Dialysis: News Articles
| | |-+  Clarification of Media Reports on OPTN Kidney Allocation Concept Document
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Clarification of Media Reports on OPTN Kidney Allocation Concept Document  (Read 1417 times)
okarol
Administrator
Member for Life
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 100933


Photo is Jenna - after Disneyland - 1988

WWW
« on: March 04, 2011, 01:44:19 PM »

March 1, 2011

Clarification of Media Reports on OPTN Kidney Allocation Concept Document

Recent news reports have inaccurately described a request for public feedback on concepts that may be considered as part of future OPTN kidney allocation policy. To be clear, there has been no change in existing national kidney allocation policy. Furthermore, no change is imminent. Media reports have also selectively reported on the intent and possible effects of only one part of the concept document.

The document out for public comment offers concepts and rationale that have been recommended by various experts with a professional or personal involvement in kidney transplantation. Only if these concepts receive considerable public support, will they be forwarded to the next level of scrutiny and consideration. The concepts could also be amended to address specific questions or recommendations from the public before any proposal is developed.

For several years, the OPTN/UNOS Kidney Transplantation Committee http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/members/committeesDetail.asp?ID=89  has considered a variety of possible approaches to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of deceased donor kidney allocation policy. Three primary concepts are addressed in the document. Much of the media reporting has focused on the idea of age-range matching between donor and potential recipient. This reporting has overlooked or given little consideration to certain key facts about the concept:

The document outlines how access to deceased donor kidneys for candidates of all ages will continue.
For most candidates, there would be no functional difference in which organs they may be offered first. Age-range matching, if adopted, would only be the first level of consideration of potential recipients for some donor organs. If no suitable candidate is found within the suggested age range (the recipient’s age is within 15 years, older or younger, of the donor’s age), other older or younger candidates would then be considered. In fact, under the existing kidney allocation system, the majority of kidney recipients are already within the same age range (within 15 years of the donor’s age) as discussed in the concept document.
We encourage anyone interested to read the details of the concepts and the rationale that accompanies them http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/SharedContentDocuments/KidneyConceptDocument.PDF . We welcome informed opinion and comment to help ensure that the kidney allocation system is as effective as possible and operates in the public trust.

From: http://www.unos.org/about/index.php?topic=newsroom&article_id=2652:73d22cb86f1b6a9bca969577811ddd84

Logged


Admin for IHateDialysis 2008 - 2014, retired.
Jenna is our daughter, bad bladder damaged her kidneys.
Was on in-center hemodialysis 2003-2007.
7 yr transplant lost due to rejection.
She did PD Sept. 2013 - July 2017
Found a swap living donor using social media, friends, family.
New kidney in a paired donation swap July 26, 2017.
Her story ---> https://www.facebook.com/WantedKidneyDonor
Please watch her video: http://youtu.be/D9ZuVJ_s80Y
Living Donors Rock! http://www.livingdonorsonline.org -
News video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-7KvgQDWpU
MooseMom
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 11325


« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2011, 03:05:24 PM »

I have been just sitting back waiting for OPTN/UNOS to make a statement in this regard.  Thank goodness they finally did.  Notice how they are welcoming "informed opinion and comment"?  That's code for, "Read the damn document before you opine!" :rofl;
Logged

"Eggs are so inadequate, don't you think?  I mean, they ought to be able to become anything, but instead you always get a chicken.  Or a duck.  Or whatever they're programmed to be.  You never get anything interesting, like regret, or the middle of last week."
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!