I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 22, 2024, 10:51:18 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
532606 Posts in 33561 Topics by 12678 Members
Latest Member: astrobridge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  I Hate Dialysis Message Board
|-+  Dialysis Discussion
| |-+  Dialysis: News Articles
| | |-+  Are the days of kidney dialysis numbered?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Are the days of kidney dialysis numbered?  (Read 1419 times)
okarol
Administrator
Member for Life
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 100933


Photo is Jenna - after Disneyland - 1988

WWW
« on: September 03, 2010, 01:52:40 PM »

September 3, 2010 12:14 PM PDT
Are the days of kidney dialysis numbered?
by Elizabeth Armstrong Moore

There's no gentle way to put it. Chronic kidney failure is ugly and often deadly, and more people in the States are suffering from it every year, with increasing rates of diabetes and hypertension contributing to the problem.

What's more, the treatment that keeps many waiting for kidney transplants alive--dialysis--involves several sessions per week, at several hours per session, during which blood pumps through an external circuit for filtration to replace just 13 percent of kidney function, leaving many patients exhausted both physically and financially.
(The U.S. Renal Data System estimates that dialysis costs roughly $75,000 per patient per year. With more than 350,000 patients on dialysis, Medicare--via taxpayers--spends 6 percent of its total budget on treatments for kidney failure alone.)

Because of this burden on hundreds of thousands of individuals as well as the health care system as a whole, there is a lot of brainpower, money, and hope currently invested in a prototype model of the first implantable, artificial kidney, which was unveiled this week by researchers at the University of California San Francisco. The device is the result of collaboration by engineers, biologists, and physicians at research centers across the country.

"This device is designed to deliver most of the health benefits of a kidney transplant, while addressing the limited number of kidney donors each year," says Shuvo Roy, an associate professor in the UCSF School of Pharmacy who is leading the interdisciplinary effort. "This could dramatically reduce the burden of renal failure for millions of people worldwide, while also reducing one of the largest costs in U.S. health care."

The implantable kidney includes thousands of nanoscale filters that remove toxins from the blood, while a BioCartridge of renal tubule cells act as the metabolic and water-balancing control center.
(Credit: UCSF)
Roy's team is essentially mimicking a proven treatment, which uses a room-sized external kidney developed in Michigan, but scaling it down to a size and form that could be implanted into the body without relying on dialysis or immune suppressant meds. In other words, it could enable patients who don't lead normal lives to start.
Roy says the team hopes to apply silicon fabrication technology with specially engineered compartments for live kidney cells so that the model will be roughly the size of a coffee cup. It will include thousands of microscopic filters and a bioreactor to act as the metabolic and water-balancing control center that is lost when a kidney fails.
The first phase of the project was to develop the technologies required to reduce the device to a size that could fit into the body, and to be able to test the components in animal models. Mission accomplished, so now the team is tweaking the device for human compatibility, and with the components and a visual model is hoping to secure federal and private support for clinical trials.
Roy's team is collaborating with 10 additional research teams, including the Cleveland Clinic, where he initially developed the idea; Case Western Reserve University; the University of Michigan; Ohio State University; and Penn State.

 Elizabeth Armstrong Moore is a freelance journalist based in Portland, Ore. She has contributed to Wired magazine, The Christian Science Monitor, and public radio. Her semi-obscure hobbies include unicycling, slacklining, hula-hooping, scuba diving, billiards, Sudoku, Magic the Gathering, and classical piano. She is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.


Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-27083_3-20015581-247.html#ixzz0yVArYZVH
Logged


Admin for IHateDialysis 2008 - 2014, retired.
Jenna is our daughter, bad bladder damaged her kidneys.
Was on in-center hemodialysis 2003-2007.
7 yr transplant lost due to rejection.
She did PD Sept. 2013 - July 2017
Found a swap living donor using social media, friends, family.
New kidney in a paired donation swap July 26, 2017.
Her story ---> https://www.facebook.com/WantedKidneyDonor
Please watch her video: http://youtu.be/D9ZuVJ_s80Y
Living Donors Rock! http://www.livingdonorsonline.org -
News video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-7KvgQDWpU
RichardMEL
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6154


« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2010, 08:01:09 AM »

In my view this kind of thing is the second best option after stem cell based research leading to replacement organs.

Now this article doesn't go into much detail - I mean OK this coffee cup sized thing, they implant it.... but does the "bioreactor" need to be "restocked" at some point? What if the filters get clogged or something like that?

Obviously they're still at the start of this and seeking funding, but I can imagine something like this, implanted internally, would be filtering 24/7, so even if it wasn't as efficient as an external dialysis unit, the outcome would still be so much better for us as patients. There would be generally ongoing internal dialysis, even better than PD (no exchanges), and that would hopefully mean no restrictions on fluids or diet. There would not be any need for antirejection meds.

Obviously anything useful out of this research will be years, maybe even decades off, but there is hope that, in time, there will be options other than transplant and dialysis.

 :2thumbsup;
Logged



3/1993: Diagnosed with Kidney Failure (FSGS)
25/7/2006: Started hemo 3x/week 5 hour sessions :(
27/11/2010: Cadaveric kidney transplant from my wonderful donor!!! "Danny" currently settling in and working better every day!!! :)

BE POSITIVE * BE INFORMED * BE PROACTIVE * BE IN CONTROL * LIVE LIFE!
Jie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 521


« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2010, 12:15:46 PM »

Yeah, we probably will not see this thing for public use in our life time...
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!