Update to the American with Disabilities Act

[skuch65]

Has anyone seen the update to the ADA that Pres Bush has just signed into law?  I seen an article on a goverment web page but I can't get it to load up.  The head line just said that Bush just signed the updated act into law after five years.

[boxman55]

Sweeping ADA update would affect millionsBy ROBERT PEAR

The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration is about to propose far-reaching rules that would give people with disabilities greater access to tens of thousands of courtrooms, swimming pools, golf courses, stadiums, theaters, hotels and stores.

The proposal would substantially update and rewrite federal standards for enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act, a landmark civil-rights law passed with strong bipartisan support in 1990.

The new rules would set more stringent requirements in many areas and address some issues for the first time, in an effort to meet the needs of an aging population and growing numbers of disabled war veterans.

More than 7 million businesses and all state and local government agencies would be affected. The proposal includes some exemptions for parts of existing buildings, but any new construction or renovations would have to comply.

The new standards would, for example, affect the location of light switches, the height of retail service counters and the use of monkeys as service animals.

The Bush administration approved the proposal in May after a five-month review. It is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, with 60 days for public comment. After considering those comments, the government would issue final rules with the force of law.

The proposal is stirring concern. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce says it would be onerous and costly, but advocates for disabled people say it does not go far enough.

The Census Bureau says more than 51 million Americans have a disability, with nearly two-thirds reporting severe impairments.

Proposed requirements

The proposed rules, under development for more than four years, flesh out the meaning of the 1990 law, which set forth broad objectives. The 215,000-word proposal includes these new requirements:

• Courts would have to provide a lift or ramp to ensure that people in wheelchairs could get into the witness stand.

• Auditoriums would have to provide a lift or ramp so wheelchair users could "participate fully and equally in graduation exercises and other events."

• Any sports stadium with a seating capacity of 25,000 or more would have to provide safety and emergency information by posting written messages on scoreboards and video monitors to alert people who are deaf or hard of hearing.

• Light switches in hotel rooms could not be more than 48 inches high. The current maximum is 54 inches.

• A new swimming pool with a perimeter of more than 300 feet would have to provide "at least two accessible means of entry," such as a gentle sloping ramp or a chair lift.

The Justice Department estimated the changes would cost $23 billion.

Under the 1990 law, businesses are supposed to remove barriers to people with disabilities if the changes are "readily achievable," meaning they can be "carried out without much difficulty or expense."

The Bush administration is proposing a safe harbor for small businesses. They could meet their obligations in a given year if, in the prior year, they had spent at least 1 percent of their gross revenues to remove barriers.

Curtis Decker, executive director of the National Disability Rights Network, a coalition of legal advocates, said: "Safe harbors make us very nervous. A small business could spend the requisite amount of money and still not be accessible."

Randel Johnson, a vice president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said the proposed rules "are so long and technically complex that even the best-intentioned small business could be found out of compliance by a clever lawyer looking to force a settlement."

Limits on service animals

The proposed rules affirm the right of people with disabilities to use guide dogs and other service animals in public places, but they tighten the definition to exclude certain species.

When the existing rules were adopted in the early 1990s, the Justice Department said, few people anticipated the current trend toward "the use of wild, exotic or unusual species" as service animals.

The proposed rules define a service animal as "any dog or other common domestic animal individually trained to do work or perform tasks" for a person with a physical or mental disability.

Under this definition, monkeys would not qualify as service animals. The proposed rules also would exclude snakes and other reptiles; amphibians; rabbits, ferrets and rodents; and farm animals such as horses, pigs and goats.

The rules confirm that people with disabilities can use traditional wheelchairs, power wheelchairs and electric scooters in any public areas open to pedestrians. But shopping centers and other public places could impose reasonable restrictions on Segway vehicles, golf carts and similar devices.

Signed into law by President Bush...Boxman

[monrein]

Under this definition, monkeys would not qualify as service animals. The proposed rules also would exclude snakes and other reptiles; amphibians; rabbits, ferrets and rodents; and farm animals such as horses, pigs and goats.



This part cracked me up.  I had a snap visual of a guy going into a restaurant with his "seeing-eye" snake or his "service" rat.  Man, you wouldn't think they'd have to spell that out but probably wise, just in case someone has a really "smart" ferret.

[skuch65]

President Bush Signs ADA Amendments Bill

By Bill Leonard

President Bush on Sept. 25, 2008, signed into law landmark legislation that will clarify and strengthen worker protections guaranteed by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

“The Americans with Disabilities Act is instrumental in allowing individuals with disabilities to fully participate in our economy and society, and the administration supports efforts to enhance its protections,” the president said in a written statement released prior to signing the bill. “The administration believes that the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 is a step in the right direction, and is encouraged by the improvements made to it during the legislative process.”

The law is set to take effect on Jan. 1, 2009.

Both houses of Congress passed the ADA Amendments Act (S 3406) with overwhelming bipartisan support. The measure was introduced to make legislative fixes for several federal court rulings and restore the original intent of Congress when the law was enacted.

The court decisions had limited worker protections offered under the existing statute and had “excluded individuals who should have been covered under the ADA,” according to a letter sent to Congress from a coalition of business-related and disability advocacy groups.

The groups, which included the Society for Human Resource Management, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the American Diabetes Association and the National Disability Rights Network, announced their support of the ADA Amendments Act, stating that the measure struck “an appropriate balance between the needs of individuals with disabilities and those of employers.”

According to a summary released by the Congressional Research Service, the new law will:

• Prohibit the consideration of measures that reduce or mitigate the impact of impairment—such as medication, prosthetics and assistive technology—in determining whether an individual has a disability.

• Cover workers whose employers discriminate against them based on a perception that the worker is impaired, regardless of whether the worker has a disability.

• Clarify that the Americans with Disabilities Act provides broad coverage to protect anyone who faces discrimination on the basis of a disability.

Bill Leonard is senior writer for SHRM Online.

Related Resources: