I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 24, 2024, 09:15:07 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
532606 Posts in 33561 Topics by 12678 Members
Latest Member: astrobridge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  I Hate Dialysis Message Board
|-+  Dialysis Discussion
| |-+  Dialysis: News Articles
| | |-+  Sensipar Shows Benefit in Dialysis Patients
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Sensipar Shows Benefit in Dialysis Patients  (Read 3324 times)
okarol
Administrator
Member for Life
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 100933


Photo is Jenna - after Disneyland - 1988

WWW
« on: April 05, 2013, 09:34:38 AM »

Sensipar Shows Benefit in Dialysis Patients
By Kristina Fiore, Staff Writer, MedPage Today
Published: April 05, 2013
Reviewed by Zalman S. Agus, MD; Emeritus Professor, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania

For best viewing, click the bottom right corner for full screen.
Action Points
Note that this study was published as an abstract and presented at a conference. These data and conclusions should be considered to be preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.
In this analysis of data from the randomized EVOLVE trial, the need for parathyroidectomy was reduced by the use of cinacalcet.

ORLANDO -- Taking cinacalcet (Sensipar) may lessen the need for parathyroidectomy among patients with hyperparathyroidism who are on dialysis, researchers reported
here.

In a post-hoc analysis of the EVOLVE trial, the time to first parathyroidectomy was significantly longer among patients on cinacalcet compared with placebo (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.54, P<0.001), Ricardo Correa-Rotter, MD, of the National Institute of Medical Sciences & Nutrition in Mexico City, and colleagues reported at the National Kidney Foundation meeting here.

"The group on cinacalcet had half of the parathyroidectomy events as the group on placebo," he said. "It's expected because cinacalcet is effective in reducing parathyroid hormone, which has previously been demonstrated in EVOLVE and many other studies."

Cinacalcet "without doubt was protective" in the trial, Correa-Rotter added, and that it is "fairly clear" that the drug is "useful" for these patients.

Secondary hyperparathyroidism often progresses in patients on dialysis, despite medical therapy, and refractory cases often need surgery. In that setting it was speculated that cinacalcet, which acts to diminish serum calcium levels, could improve outcomes for this population.

But the results of the 3,883-patient EVOLVE trial -- which were reported simultaneously at Kidney Week and in the New England Journal of Medicine last November -- suggested otherwise. Researchers found that the drug didn't reduce the risk of death or major cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease patients who have secondary hyperparathyroidism, compared with placebo.

The FDA also stopped all pediatric trials of the drug in February after the death of a 14-year-old patient in one of the trials.

In order to assess the impact of cinacalcet specifically on rates of parathyroidectomy, as well as risk factors for needing the surgery, Correa-Rotter and colleagues conducted this post-hoc analysis of EVOLVE data.

The study had also recorded parathyroidectomy rate, with an overall rate of 10.7% -- although the rate was far higher for patients on placebo than for those on cinacalcet (14% versus 7%), they reported.

In further analyses, Correa-Rotter and colleagues found that the time to first parathyroidectomy was significantly lower among those on cinacalcet (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.54, P<0.001).

But Correa-Rotter was cautious in interpreting the clinical significance of the findings of this post-hoc analysis: "I wouldn't say the results of this post-hoc analysis can guide our decisions at all," he warned. "I don't think there's anything we can take from this study for clinical decisions."

The analysis also showed that certain characteristics were associated with risk of parathyroidectomy. Significant predictors of a lower risk of parathyroidectomy included older age (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 0.99, P=0.002) and male sex (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.85, P=0.001).

Parathyroidectomy was also significantly associated with geographic region, with higher risk for the procedure in Latin America (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.69 to 3.98, P<0.001) and Russia (HR 3.74, 95% CI 2.18 to 6.41, P<0.001), they found.

Correa-Rotter explained that these findings are probably due to the fact that patients enrolled in the trial from these countries were younger than those in other countries.

"The patients are younger in these regions," he said, "because the population on dialysis is younger in those parts of the world."

The EVOLVE trial was supported by Amgen.

Correa-Rotter reported no conflicts of interest.

Primary source: National Kidney Foundation
Source reference:
Parfrey P, et al "Disease progression and surgical parathyroidectomy in the EVOLVE trial" NKF 2013; Abstract 72.

http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/NKF/38267
Logged


Admin for IHateDialysis 2008 - 2014, retired.
Jenna is our daughter, bad bladder damaged her kidneys.
Was on in-center hemodialysis 2003-2007.
7 yr transplant lost due to rejection.
She did PD Sept. 2013 - July 2017
Found a swap living donor using social media, friends, family.
New kidney in a paired donation swap July 26, 2017.
Her story ---> https://www.facebook.com/WantedKidneyDonor
Please watch her video: http://youtu.be/D9ZuVJ_s80Y
Living Donors Rock! http://www.livingdonorsonline.org -
News video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-7KvgQDWpU
amanda100wilson
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1202

« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2013, 10:03:17 AM »

you would hope so.  didn't help me as I had primary adenoma too that was pumping out so much that the srnsipar couldn't control it although I would have probably had op before if it weren't for it.  they didn't know that I had a big ol' tumor sitting there until they wrnt in to take thm out, which was strange as I had an ultrasound to my thyroid not long ago which failedvto pick it up.
Logged

ESRD 22 years
  -PD for 18 months
  -Transplant 10 years
  -PD for 8 years
  -NxStage since October 2011
Healthy people may look upon me as weak because of my illness, but my illness has given me strength that they can't begin to imagine.

Always look on the bright side of life...
lmunchkin
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2471

"There Is No Place Like Home!"

« Reply #2 on: April 07, 2013, 02:25:11 PM »

Looks like John will be put back on Sensipar as his PTH is climbing slightly.  It is expensive, even with Medicare Part D.  Hope to get help with financially.  $305. per mth is a lot of money.  SW gonna seek help with it.  We will find out tomorrow.

I really do believe it helped John out immensley!  He is doing his binders like he should too, which has helped keep PTH down some, but needs the senspar to keep it from spiking!!

God bless,
lmunchkin :kickstart;
Logged

11/2004 Hubby diag. ESRD, Diabeties, Vascular Disease & High BP
12/2004 to 6/2009 Home PD
6/2009 Peritonitis , PD Cath removed
7/2009 Hemo Dialysis In-Center
2/2010 BKA rt leg & lt foot (all toes) amputated
6/2010 to present.  NxStage at home
Rerun
Member for Life
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 12242


Going through life tied to a chair!

« Reply #3 on: April 07, 2013, 03:02:12 PM »

I've been on Sensapar for 8 years.  You would think all the "research" was done years ago before the FDA Approved the drug!  I mean this isn't really "Breaking NEws".  Sensapar IS, after all, supposed to lower our PTH.  And researchers are just confirming this?  Wow, I can't wait until they pay billions to see if Renvela works, after I stuff about 8 down a day!

I'm glad the article wasn't tiltled "Research finds Sensapar makes patients go Blind -- Oops"

                   :waving;
Logged

lmunchkin
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2471

"There Is No Place Like Home!"

« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2013, 08:03:31 PM »

I've been on Sensapar for 8 years.  You would think all the "research" was done years ago before the FDA Approved the drug!  I mean this isn't really "Breaking NEws".  Sensapar IS, after all, supposed to lower our PTH.  And researchers are just confirming this?  Wow, I can't wait until they pay billions to see if Renvela works, after I stuff about 8 down a day!

I'm glad the article wasn't tiltled "Research finds Sensapar makes patients go Blind -- Oops"
                   :waving;

  :rofl; :rofl; :rofl;     you are a trip, Rerun!

Update on John's sensipar, it will cost "0" dollars.  I don't know how, but His neph said he had to have it and I don't know if she foot the bill or clinic, but we were told to go get it and pay nothing.  GOD IS GREAT!!! Amen?  He knew I was worried about paying for it & HE provided it for us!!!!!!  Praise be to The Father in Heaven.

I was so excited.  Here I was worried, but I was going to find a way, though I said I wasnt.  I would have worked extra hours to pay that, but now, I won't have to!!!

Thanking Jesus for everything.  Open the door & HE WILL GO THROUGH IT WITH YOU!!!  :guitar: :pray; :guitar: :pray;
lmunchkin :kickstart;
Logged

11/2004 Hubby diag. ESRD, Diabeties, Vascular Disease & High BP
12/2004 to 6/2009 Home PD
6/2009 Peritonitis , PD Cath removed
7/2009 Hemo Dialysis In-Center
2/2010 BKA rt leg & lt foot (all toes) amputated
6/2010 to present.  NxStage at home
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!