I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 27, 2024, 03:27:57 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
532606 Posts in 33561 Topics by 12678 Members
Latest Member: astrobridge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  I Hate Dialysis Message Board
|-+  Dialysis Discussion
| |-+  Dialysis: Transplant Discussion
| | |-+  Steroid Free Transplants!?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Steroid Free Transplants!?  (Read 2356 times)
meadowlandsnj
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 449


WWW
« on: December 01, 2006, 11:38:12 AM »

Abstract: Excellent clinical outcomes in primary kidney transplant recipients treated with steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression
by Rajab, Amer; Pelletier, Ronald P.; Henry, Mitchell L.; Ferguson, Ronald M.

Steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression is desirable to eliminate the side effects of chronic corticosteroid use. Complete steroid avoidance or rapid post-transplant steroid withdrawal has recently been used in renal transplant recipients with encouraging results. The present study evaluated the outcome of a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol in kidney transplant recipients with at least one-year follow up. Between April 2002 and October 2004, a total of 301 primary kidney transplant recipients received steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression. The regimen consisted of induction with thymogobulin and prednisone for the first five d. Patients were maintained on Sirolimus and Neoral. Neoral dose was adjusted to target C2 levels and the Sirolimus dose was adjusted to a target rapamycin trough level. All primary kidney transplants (n = 502) performed in the two year (starting January 2000) prior to institution of the steroid-free regimen and thus maintained on a steroid-based immunosuppressive protocol were used for comparison. One-year patient and death censored graft survival were 93.1% and 98.1% for the steroid-free group vs. 95.2% and 95.2% for the comparator groups (p = ns). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 4.9% in the steroid-free group vs. 9.4% in the comparator group (p < 0.01). Two (0.7%) of 301 patients in the steroid-free group lost their grafts because of acute rejection compared with nine (1.8%) patients in the comparator group (p < 0.05). At one-year post-transplant the mean serum creatinine level was not different between the two groups. There were no significant differences in mean serum cholesterol and triglycerides levels as well as the percentage of patients on lipid lowering agents between the groups. White blood cell counts, daily doses of Neoral and weight gain were significantly lower in the steroid-free group vs. the comparator group. However, more patients in the steroid-free group required erythropoietin and iron therapy for anemia (p < 0.001). We conclude that excellent graft survival with a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection can be achieved using a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol consisting of Neoral and Sirolimus.

Source: Clin Transplant 2006: 20: 537-546.
Date: Nov. 4, 2006
Logged

Facebook: DonnaMarieMenard
BigSky
Elite Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2380


« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2006, 03:49:15 PM »

Just wondering.

How were the patients chosen?

Were they random patients or were they patients that were specifically tested for low HLA levels?
« Last Edit: December 01, 2006, 03:51:25 PM by BigSky » Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!