I Hate Dialysis Message Board
Dialysis Discussion => Dialysis: News Articles => Topic started by: okarol on June 19, 2013, 01:47:34 PM
-
Rosemary Frei, MSc
June 18, 2013
Peritoneal Dialysis Cheaper than Hemodialysis Worldwide
HONG KONG—Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is much less expensive than hemodialysis (HD) in most places around the world, including North America, a new cost analysis has confirmed. Therefore, since the two modalities are clinically equivalent, PD should be used more, according to investigators.
Their study—which they published online in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation and presented at the 2013 World Congress of Nephrology—showed the cost of HD is between 1.25 and 2.35 time higher than that of PD in five developing and 17 developed countries. In the U.S., for example, the HD:PD cost ratio is 1.29:1 and in Canada it is 1.9:1.
“While I understand that it is rather difficult in the U.S. and Canada to have a PD-first policy or a target percentage of PD use, it is clear that something should be done to improve PD education and awareness among doctors,” said lead investigator Aakash Nayak Karopadi, BE, MSc, from the International Renal Research Institute Vicenza, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy, told Renal & Urology News. “Seven percent of dialysis in the U.S. is done with PD. If the percentage in the U.S. could be increased to the world average of 12%, the savings to the American economy would be about $300 million every year.”
Karopadi and his co-investigators in Italy and India searched the published literature for studies on the cost and use of PD and HD, and mailed questionnaires to senior nephrologists in countries from which no published data were available. They then tabulated the results for 46 countries.
PD:HD cost ratios range from 2.35 in Hong Kong, where there is a PD-first policy, to 0.22 in Egypt. Furthermore, the rates of PD per million people vary from 0.06 in Nigeria to 488.5 in Hong Kong. The rates of HD per million people run from 0.2 in Ghana to 2,107 in Japan and Taiwan.
In the U.S. the rate of PD per million people is 87 and that for HD is 1,157 (the HD rate is third-highest after Japan and Taiwan). The U.S. Renal Data System 2012 Annual Report states that the annual per-patient HD cost is approximately $87,500 while for PD it is $66,750.
The investigators also performed analyses that indicate countries with a higher Human Development Index score—a composite of life expectancy, educational level, and income—have higher costs of HD relative to PD, as do countries with a higher prevalence of PD per million population. Conversely, the HD:PD cost ratio decreases with increased percentage of private health care in countries' total health care expenditures.
Governments can effectively promote PD use by PD-first programs, the team concludes. They note other policies that are particularly effective in developing countries are local manufacturing of the PD bags or reduction of PD-bag import duties.
http://www.renalandurologynews.com/peritoneal-dialysis-cheaper-than-hemodialysis-worldwide/article/299247/
-
The biggest advantage of PD over HD is that it supports any remaining kidney function, too. The longer you still have that magic peeing function, the better.
-
I've been on HD for 3 years now and I still pee as much as I did when I started!
-
I've been on HD for 3 years now and I still pee as much as I did when I started!
Jenna also never stopped urinating during 3 years of hemo.
-
HD doesn't stop your peeing abilities. It seems that PD puts less strain on the remaining kidney function and leaves you able to pee for longer.
I haven't yet worked out how they arrived at this conclusion. It might be the result of PD being constantly working and HD (especially in-centre) working only while you're hooked up.