I Hate Dialysis Message Board

Dialysis Discussion => Dialysis: News Articles => Topic started by: MooseMom on March 08, 2011, 10:16:17 AM

Title: They should have just visited IHD!
Post by: MooseMom on March 08, 2011, 10:16:17 AM
Abstract


http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/03/07/ndt.gfr071.abstract


Background. Despite growing literature of the dialysis patients’ high burden of illness and a compromised quality of life, little is known about their daily life experiences.
Methods. A cross-sectional study using the day reconstruction method, an experience sampling method, was used. Seventy-one dialysis patients recruited from three dialysis centers systematically reconstructed their activities and experiences of the preceding day. Time spent on their activities, settings and associated emotions were assessed to compute U-Index scores (the percentage of time a person spent in an unpleasant or undesirable state). Patients also completed the Illness Effects Questionnaire-Self-Report (IEQ-S) and the Short-Form Health Survey-36 v2 (SF-36v2).
Results. Patients spent ∼6 h of their day (excluding sleep hours) in an unpleasant or undesirable state (U-Index = 34.45 ± 29.26). U-Index scores did not differ by race, age, sex or years on dialysis and were moderately associated with IEQ-S scores (r = 0.43, P ≤ 0.001) and weakly associated with SF-36v2 physical component scores (r = −0.34, P = 0.003). U-Index scores differed significantly between dialysis days and non-dialysis days for hemodialysis patients (P = 0.012). Those who had depression or used antidepressants and reported income not meeting basic needs showed significantly higher U-Index scores than their counterparts (P < 0.05).
Conclusions. The findings may assist clinicians to better understand the daily activities and burdens experienced by dialysis patients and suggest areas for future research and clinical considerations to improve the quality of their lives.

Is this a study of the bloody obvious?  I read a lot of these abstracts, many of them copied here onto IHD, and I am constantly amazed by them...the effort, time and resources devoted to studying things that seem rather obvious and seemingly always call for "further studies."  What could physicians do to reduce the "treatment burden"?  I wonder if these authors have ever come up with useful strategies. 

Title: Re: They should have just visited IHD!
Post by: paul.karen on March 08, 2011, 10:55:31 AM
LOL  I agree MM.

Do people get paid to do these studies?  Grants and what not.

I ques that I'm lucky i dint have 6 hours a day to be in an unpleasant/undesirable mood.

And i would bet money that there are tons of people who are NOT on dialysis that would fit into this study
Title: Re: They should have just visited IHD!
Post by: jbeany on March 08, 2011, 07:30:40 PM
"Reduce the treatment burden"  Duh.  Cure ESRD - we'll all be much happier people.